Comparison Overview

IKEA

VS

Lidl France

IKEA

Olof Palmestraat 1, Delft, 2616, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

The IKEA vision is to create a better everyday life for the many people. Our business idea is to offer well-designed, functional and affordable, high-quality home furnishing, produced with care for people and the environment. The IKEA Brand unites more than 200.000 co-workers and hundreds of companies with different owners all over the world. It’s one brand, but it reaches millions of hearts and homes. Our value chain is unique. It includes everything from product development, design, supply, manufacture and sales – and of course it begins and ends with our customers. The IKEA retail business is operated through a franchise system. Today, 12 different groups of companies market and sell the IKEA product range under franchise agreements with Inter IKEA Systems B.V. Any jobs published on this page are offered by different companies operating under the IKEA Trademark.   IKEA was founded in Sweden in 1943.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 92,436
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Lidl France

1, Rue de Hanovre, Châtenay-Malabry, Île-de-France, FR, 92290
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Lidl s’est implanté en France en 1989. Nous avons connu une expansion très rapide qui nous a permis de devenir un acteur incontournable de la grande distribution. Lidl France, c’est aujourd’hui 45 000 collaborateurs, plus de 1 570 magasins, 25 Directions Régionales et un siège social sur 2 sites : à Strasbourg qui regroupe toutes les fonctions supports administratives (Administration RH et Formation, Finances, Informatique) et à Rungis où nous avons regroupé toutes les fonctions supports opérationnelles (Centrale d’Achats, Logistique et Supply Chain, Immobilier, Technique, Développement Commercial, Investissements, RH, Juridique et Frais Généraux). En 2012, Lidl a opéré un tournant de son histoire, avec une nouvelle aventure commerciale : rénovation des magasins, élargissement de l’offre de produit, modernisation des packagings et du merchandising en magasin ; un vrai challenge ! Aujourd’hui, acteur incontournable de la grande distribution française, LIDL s’est imposé en tant que commerce de proximité à assortiment sélectionné : nous avons augmenté nos parts de marché, nous avons su gagner la confiance de nouveaux clients et avons été élu « Meilleure chaîne de magasins » depuis plusieurs années consécutives.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 12,385
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikea.jpeg
IKEA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lidl-france.jpeg
Lidl France
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IKEA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lidl France
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IKEA in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lidl France in 2025.

Incident History — IKEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IKEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lidl France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lidl France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ikea.jpeg
IKEA
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 05/2022
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing emails
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lidl-france.jpeg
Lidl France
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lidl France company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IKEA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IKEA company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lidl France company has not reported any.

In the current year, Lidl France company and IKEA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Lidl France company nor IKEA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

IKEA company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Lidl France company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IKEA company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Lidl France company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IKEA company nor Lidl France company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IKEA nor Lidl France holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IKEA company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lidl France company.

IKEA company employs more people globally than Lidl France company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither IKEA nor Lidl France holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IKEA nor Lidl France holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IKEA nor Lidl France holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IKEA nor Lidl France holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IKEA nor Lidl France holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IKEA nor Lidl France holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H