Comparison Overview
iHarbor - University of Maryland Medical System Innovation Center
iHarbor - University of Maryland Medical System Innovation Center
250 W Pratt St, Baltimore, 21201, US
Last Update: 12/12/2025
iHarbor leads the way in reimagining health care – bringing to life solutions that enhance quality, elevate outcomes and optimize operations. As the innovation and incubation studio at the University of Maryland Medical System (UMMS), iHarbor ideates and purposefully bu...
Wellstar Health System
Marietta, 30062, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At Wellstar Health System, our mission is to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. Nationally ranked and locally recognized for our high-quality care, inclusive culture and world-class doctors and caregivers, Wellstar is one of the largest, most in...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
iHarbor - University of Maryland Medical System Innovation Center
Wellstar Health System
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for iHarbor - University of Maryland Medical System Innovation Center in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Wellstar Health System in 2026.
Incident History - iHarbor - University of Maryland Medical System Innovation Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)
iHarbor - University of Maryland Medical System Innovation Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Wellstar Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Wellstar Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
iHarbor - University of Maryland Medical System Innovation Center
Wellstar Health System
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.