Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)
VS
Enterprise MobilityEnterprise Mobility
International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)

International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)

28 The Quadrant, Richmond, Surrey , TW9 1DN, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://igtmarket.com
754/1000Fair

The International Golf Travel Market is the premier event for the golf travel industry. Over 500 golf tourism suppliers join 350 pre-qualified buyers and 50+ international press for four days of pre-scheduled appointments, networking opportunities and industry updates. ...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:91
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Enterprise Mobility

Enterprise Mobility

600 Corporate Park Drive, St. Louis, Missouri, US, 63105

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

At Enterprise Mobility™ we are paving a new way forward by creating better experiences for how we move. We give people around the world the ability to connect in ways that suit their unique needs. It’s a bold idea that has defined our purpose-led, people-first organizat...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:68,019
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)

International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Enterprise Mobility

Enterprise Mobility

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enterprise Mobility in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Enterprise Mobility (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enterprise Mobility cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)

International Golf Travel Market (IGTM)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Enterprise Mobility

Enterprise Mobility

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) company and Enterprise Mobility company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) and Enterprise Mobility, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) and Enterprise Mobility, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) or Enterprise Mobility ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) or Enterprise Mobility ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) and Enterprise Mobility, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between International Golf Travel Market (IGTM) and Enterprise Mobility, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9