Comparison Overview

IGT

VS

Bosch Global Software Technologies

IGT

6355 S Buffalo Dr, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89113
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 0 and 549

IGT is a leading global provider of gaming, digital and financial technology solutions, formed through the combination of International Game Technology PLC’s Gaming & Digital Business and Everi Holdings Inc. IGT’s offering spans gaming machines, game content and systems, iGaming, sports betting, cash access, loyalty and player engagement solutions, enabling it to deliver integrated, customer-centric experiences across land-based and digital environments. Organized into Gaming, Digital and FinTech business units, IGT drives innovation, efficiency and value for casino, digital and hospitality operators worldwide. The company is headquartered in Las Vegas.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 9,833
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Bosch Global Software Technologies

123, Koramangala Industrial Layout,, Hosur Road, Bangalore, Karnataka, IN, 560095
Last Update: 2025-11-21

With our unique ability to offer end-to-end solutions that connect the three pillars of IoT - Sensors, Software, and Services, we enable businesses to move from the traditional to the digital, or improve businesses by introducing a digital element in their products and processes. Now more than ever, companies across the world are becoming rapidly aware of the potential and impact of modern-day digital technologies on customers, people, and organisational processes. We aim to empower and translate this realisation into a new reality for enterprises, leveraging our in-depth understanding of global business complexities, the risk of disruption that digital technologies bring, and the technology thought leadership that we have built over decades of experience at Bosch. Founded in 1997, we are a 100% owned subsidiary of Robert Bosch GmbH, with over 35,000 associates across the globe. [Data protection notice: www.bosch-softwaretechnologies.com/en/terms-of-use/data-protection-notice/ ]

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 25,520
Subsidiaries: 69
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igt.jpeg
IGT
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bosch-global-software-technologies.jpeg
Bosch Global Software Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IGT
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bosch Global Software Technologies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

IGT has 127.27% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bosch Global Software Technologies in 2025.

Incident History — IGT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IGT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bosch Global Software Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bosch Global Software Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/igt.jpeg
IGT
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, data extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bosch-global-software-technologies.jpeg
Bosch Global Software Technologies
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated Network Access, Custom Protocol Exploitation (Volkswagen, BMW, etc.), Web Application Vulnerabilities in Management Interface
Motivation: Potential Financial Gain (Ransomware), Industrial Sabotage, Extortion via Product Quality Manipulation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Bosch Global Software Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IGT company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IGT company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Bosch Global Software Technologies company.

In the current year, IGT company has reported more cyber incidents than Bosch Global Software Technologies company.

IGT company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Bosch Global Software Technologies company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bosch Global Software Technologies company nor IGT company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bosch Global Software Technologies company nor IGT company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Bosch Global Software Technologies company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while IGT company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IGT nor Bosch Global Software Technologies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Bosch Global Software Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IGT company.

Bosch Global Software Technologies company employs more people globally than IGT company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither IGT nor Bosch Global Software Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IGT nor Bosch Global Software Technologies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IGT nor Bosch Global Software Technologies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IGT nor Bosch Global Software Technologies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IGT nor Bosch Global Software Technologies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IGT nor Bosch Global Software Technologies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.