Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IFT Protein DivisionIFT Protein Division
VS
Arla FoodsArla Foods
IFT Protein Division

IFT Protein Division

Chicago, US

Last Update: 23/11/2025

View Profile

Addresses all aspects of the science and technology of plant based, muscle based and alternative proteins. This includes the nutritional aspects, processing, protein interactions, satiety, and functional properties.

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Arla Foods

Arla Foods

Sønderhøj 14, Viby, DK, 8260

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arla.com
780/1000Fair

We are more than 23,000 colleagues across 39 countries and 7,624 dairy farmer-owners in Denmark, Sweden, United Kingdom, Germany, Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands. We aim to create the future of dairy, to bring healthy and sustainable dairy products to people ac...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:14,291
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IFT Protein Division

IFT Protein Division

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arla Foods

Arla Foods

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IFT Protein Division in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arla Foods in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IFT Protein Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IFT Protein Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arla Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arla Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IFT Protein Division

IFT Protein Division

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Arla Foods

Arla Foods

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ARL858052025

FAQ

Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IFT Protein Division company and Arla Foods company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IFT Protein Division and Arla Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IFT Protein Division and Arla Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IFT Protein Division or Arla Foods ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IFT Protein Division or Arla Foods ?
Between IFT Protein Division and Arla Foods, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IFT Protein Division and Arla Foods, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8