Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IFS Energy & ResourcesIFS Energy & Resources
VS
ExxonMobilExxonMobil
IFS Energy & Resources

IFS Energy & Resources

1670 Broadway, Suite 2800, Denver, CO, US, 80202

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

IFS Energy and Resources is the world’s largest independent provider of software and data solutions exclusively serving the upstream oil and gas, mining, and resource industries. Professionals from more than 1,700 companies globally rely on IFS’ integrated oil and gas d...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:434
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil

US

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.exxonmobil.com
828/1000Good

The need for energy is universal. That's why ExxonMobil scientists and engineers are pioneering new research and pursuing new technologies to reduce emissions while creating more efficient fuels. We're committed to responsibly meeting the world's energy needs. We aim...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:72,624
Subsidiaries:37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IFS Energy & Resources

IFS Energy & Resources

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IFS Energy & Resources in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ExxonMobil in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IFS Energy & Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IFS Energy & Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ExxonMobil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ExxonMobil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IFS Energy & Resources

IFS Energy & Resources

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
P2E2233221222
ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
EXX000120924

FAQ

Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources company and ExxonMobil company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources and ExxonMobil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources and ExxonMobil, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IFS Energy & Resources or ExxonMobil ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IFS Energy & Resources or ExxonMobil ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources and ExxonMobil, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IFS Energy & Resources and ExxonMobil, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8