Comparison Overview
IFS Energy & Resources

IFS Energy & Resources
1670 Broadway, Suite 2800, Denver, CO, US, 80202
Last Update: 04/04/2026
IFS Energy and Resources is the world’s largest independent provider of software and data solutions exclusively serving the upstream oil and gas, mining, and resource industries. Professionals from more than 1,700 companies globally rely on IFS’ integrated oil and gas d...

Ecopetrol
Cra. 13 No. 36-24, Bogotá, CO, ----
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Ecopetrol (NYSE: EC) es la compañía más grande en Colombia y uno de los principales grupos de energía de Latinoamérica. Cuenta con más de 18.000 empleados y es responsable del 60% de la producción de hidrocarburos en Colombia. Es propietaria de las dos refinerías del Co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

IFS Energy & Resources







Ecopetrol






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IFS Energy & Resources in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
Ecopetrol has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - IFS Energy & Resources (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IFS Energy & Resources cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ecopetrol (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ecopetrol cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

IFS Energy & Resources

Ecopetrol
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.