Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

The French Institute in IndiaThe French Institute in India
VS
France TravailFrance Travail
The French Institute in India

The French Institute in India

2, APJ Abdul Kalam Rd, New Delhi, 110011, IN

Last Update: 12/06/2026

View Profile
651/1000Weak

The French Institute / IFI (Institut français en Inde) is a section of the Embassy of France responsible for promoting and nurturing people-to-people ties between France and India. IFI performs numerous functions: from promoting academic and scientific exchanges between...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:55
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
France Travail

France Travail

1, avenue du docteur Gley, Paris, FR, 75020

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
718/1000Moderate

France Travail est un acteur majeur du marché de l’emploi en France où il s’investit pour faciliter le retour à l’emploi des demandeurs d’emploi et offrir aux entreprises des réponses adaptées à leurs besoins de recrutement. Les 55 000 collaborateurs de France Travail...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:50,801
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
The French Institute in India

The French Institute in India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
France Travail

France Travail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

The French Institute in India has 29.58% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for France Travail in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - The French Institute in India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The French Institute in India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - France Travail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

France Travail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
The French Institute in India

The French Institute in India

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DIRIFIFRE1781260189
France Travail

France Travail

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FRA242072325
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FRA2692726102925
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
PLE3454923

FAQ

Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between The French Institute in India company and France Travail company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between The French Institute in India and France Travail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between The French Institute in India and France Travail, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - The French Institute in India or France Travail ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - The French Institute in India or France Travail ?
Between The French Institute in India and France Travail, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between The French Institute in India and France Travail, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA