Comparison Overview
IFC Financial Institutions

IFC Financial Institutions
2121 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, 20043, US
Last Update: 07/03/2026
In the developing world, 1.7 billion adults do not have a bank account and 200 million businesses lack access to credit. By leveraging our partnerships with financial institutions worldwide, IFC helps to foster financial inclusion, develop resilient financial markets, m...

TMF Group
Luna ArenA, Herikerbergweg 238, , Amsterdam , North Holland, NL, 1101 CM
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We provide employee, financial and legal administration so that firms can invest and operate safely around the world. TMF Group is a single global team with over 11,000 colleagues in more than 125 offices across 87 jurisdictions, covering 92% of world GDP and 95% of F...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

IFC Financial Institutions







TMF Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for IFC Financial Institutions in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TMF Group in 2026.
Incident History - IFC Financial Institutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IFC Financial Institutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TMF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TMF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

IFC Financial Institutions

TMF Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.