Comparison Overview
Industrial Engineering Department - Sharif University of Technology
Industrial Engineering Department - Sharif University of Technology
Azadi Ave 11365-11155, Tehran, Tehran, 11365-11155, IR
Last Update: 17/01/2026
The Industrial Engineering Department at Sharif University of Technology was founded in 1968 and enjoys the distinction of being the first department of its type established in Iran. Initially, industrial engineering was concerned with improving the effectiveness of ind...
Lund University
Lund University, Box 117, Lund, SE, 221 00
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Lund University has around 46 000 students and 8 600 staff based in Lund, Helsingborg and Malmö. We are united in our efforts to understand, explain and improve our world and the human condition. Lund is considered one of the most popular study locations in Sweden. The...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Industrial Engineering Department - Sharif University of Technology
Lund University
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Industrial Engineering Department - Sharif University of Technology in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Lund University in 2026.
Incident History - Industrial Engineering Department - Sharif University of Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Industrial Engineering Department - Sharif University of Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Industrial Engineering Department - Sharif University of Technology
Lund University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.