Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

IDEXXIDEXX
VS
FortreaFortrea
IDEXX

IDEXX

One IDEXX Dr, Westbrook, Maine, 04092, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.idexx.com
808/1000Good

10,000+ people, one global focus - enhancing the health and well-being of pets, people, and livestock We are passionate about what we do at IDEXX – and why wouldn’t we be? When you’re working to raise the standard of care for pets, make drinking water safe for billion...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:7,575
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Fortrea

Fortrea

Research Triangle Park, NC, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://fortrea.com
776/1000Fair

Fortrea (Nasdaq: FTRE) is a leading global clinical research organization (CRO) dedicated to providing innovative clinical development solutions to the life sciences industry. With over 30 years of clinical research experience, Fortrea has evolved from Covance and Labco...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:11,293
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
IDEXX

IDEXX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Fortrea

Fortrea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IDEXX in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fortrea in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - IDEXX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IDEXX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Fortrea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fortrea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
IDEXX

IDEXX

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Fortrea

Fortrea

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between IDEXX company and Fortrea company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between IDEXX and Fortrea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between IDEXX and Fortrea, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - IDEXX or Fortrea ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - IDEXX or Fortrea ?
Between IDEXX and Fortrea, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between IDEXX and Fortrea, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA