Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ID Logistics PortugalID Logistics Portugal
VS
La Poste GroupeLa Poste Groupe
ID Logistics Portugal

ID Logistics Portugal

En 3 – Km. 7,8 Estrada dos Arneiros 2/4, Azambuja, 2050 – 306, PT

Last Update: 10/12/2025

View Profile
750/1000Fair

A ID Logistics, liderada por Eric Hémar, é um grupo internacional de logística contratual com receitas de 3,3 mil milhões de euros em 2024. A ID Logistics gere cerca de 450 centros em 19 países, representando mais de 9 milhões de metros quadrados de instalações de armaz...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:69
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
La Poste Groupe

La Poste Groupe

9 rue du colonel Avia, Paris, FR, 75015

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
746/1000Moderate

Premier réseau commercial de proximité en France, le groupe La Poste est organisé en 4 branches d’activité : Services-Courrier-Colis, Banque et Assurance, Distributeur physique et numérique, GeoPost/DPDGroup pour l'international. Présent dans plus de 63 pays, sur 5 cont...

NAICS:47
NAICS Definition:Transportation and Warehousing
Employees:55,442
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ID Logistics Portugal

ID Logistics Portugal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
La Poste Groupe

La Poste Groupe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ID Logistics Portugal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for La Poste Groupe in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ID Logistics Portugal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ID Logistics Portugal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - La Poste Groupe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

La Poste Groupe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ID Logistics Portugal

ID Logistics Portugal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
La Poste Groupe

La Poste Groupe

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LA-BAK1767116583
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
LAP0711722

FAQ

Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal company and La Poste Groupe company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal and La Poste Groupe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal and La Poste Groupe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ID Logistics Portugal or La Poste Groupe ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ID Logistics Portugal or La Poste Groupe ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal and La Poste Groupe, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ID Logistics Portugal and La Poste Groupe, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1