Comparison Overview

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

VS

IEEE

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC

19, avenue de la Paix, Geneva, Geneva, CH, 1202
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://careers.icrc.org/

Established in 1863, the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) works worldwide to provide humanitarian help for people affected by conflict and armed violence and to promote the laws that protect victims of war. An independent and neutral organization, its mandate stems essentially from the Geneva Conventions of 1949. It takes action in response to emergencies and promotes respect for international humanitarian law and its implementation in national law. We work closely with National Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies and with their International Federation to ensure a concerted, rational and rapid humanitarian response to the needs of the victims of armed conflict or any other situation of internal violence. Find out more about the ICRC by visiting the following links: Where we work http://www.icrc.org/en/where-we-work Working for the ICRC https://careers.icrc.org/ https://www.icrc.org/en/join-icrc-and-help-protect-lives-and-dignity Current Opportunities https://bit.ly/2GuHdZR

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 12,925
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

IEEE

455 Hoes Lane, Piscataway, NJ, US, 08854
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ieee.org

IEEE is the world’s largest technical professional organization and is a public charity dedicated to advancing technological innovation and excellence for the benefit of humanity. IEEE and its members inspire a global community through its highly cited publications, conferences, technology standards, and professional and educational activities. IEEE is the trusted “voice” for engineering, computing and technology information around the globe. For information about the IEEE - visit http://www.ieee.org.

NAICS: 8135
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14,099
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ieee.jpeg
IEEE
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IEEE
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC in 2025.

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IEEE in 2025.

Incident History — International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IEEE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IEEE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/icrc.jpeg
International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Data Leak
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ieee.jpeg
IEEE
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IEEE company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IEEE company has not reported any.

In the current year, IEEE company and International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IEEE company nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IEEE company nor International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while IEEE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company nor IEEE company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor IEEE holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IEEE company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company.

IEEE company employs more people globally than International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC company, reflecting its scale as a Non-profit Organizations.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor IEEE holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor IEEE holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor IEEE holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor IEEE holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor IEEE holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Committee of the Red Cross - ICRC nor IEEE holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References