Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社
VS
Chinese Academy of SciencesChinese Academy of Sciences
ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社

ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社

久太郎町4-1-3, 大阪市, 541-0056, JP

Last Update: 18/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.iconplc.co.jp/
751/1000Fair

ICON Japanは 世界最大級のグローバルCRO ICONグループの日本拠点として、患者さんの命を救い、Quality of lifeを向上させる医薬品・医療機器の開発を行うすべてのクライアントを支援します。

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Chinese Academy of Sciences

Chinese Academy of Sciences

52 Sanlihe Rd., Beijing, CN, 100864

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://english.cas.cn/
761/1000Fair

The Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is the lead national scientific institution in natural sciences and high technology development in China and the country's supreme scientific advisory body. It incorporates three major parts: a comprehensive research and development...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:14,863
Subsidiaries:15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社

ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chinese Academy of Sciences

Chinese Academy of Sciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chinese Academy of Sciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chinese Academy of Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chinese Academy of Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社

ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Chinese Academy of Sciences

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
GOVCHI1766628286

FAQ

Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 company and Chinese Academy of Sciences company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 and Chinese Academy of Sciences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 and Chinese Academy of Sciences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 or Chinese Academy of Sciences ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 or Chinese Academy of Sciences ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 and Chinese Academy of Sciences, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ICONクリニカルリサーチ合同会社 and Chinese Academy of Sciences, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16197
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. The affected element is the function handleMessageReceive of the file pkg/channels/feishu/feishu_64.go of the component Group Message Handler. Such manipulation leads to missing authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16196
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. Impacted is the function isPrivateOrRestrictedIP of the file pkg/tools/integration/web.go of the component web_fetch. This manipulation causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. Patch name: 2efbe5d560e7ed9bc5209c203dc4aa6ecdbc7405. To fix this issue, it is recommended to deploy a patch.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-16195
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. This issue affects the function dispatchIncoming of the file pkg/channels/wecom/wecom.go of the component Group Message Handler. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-10130
SUMMARY

QueryWeaver contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to obtain valid session tokens for existing accounts by submitting a signup request with a known victim email address. The signup route unconditionally creates and links a new token to the matching Identity via a Cypher MERGE operation before checking whether the email belongs to an existing account, causing the server to return a valid authenticated session token for the victim's identity without requiring any prior credentials or user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-16194
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.1.1. This affects the function WebFetch.execute of the file agent/tools/web_fetch/web_fetch.py. Executing a manipulation of the argument url can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. Upgrading to version 2.1.2 is able to mitigate this issue. This patch is called ea47f3097eed4f8295c4cb3d76ecb97e0f43d632. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early, responded in a very professional manner and quickly released a fixed version of the affected product.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-18
UPDATED
Date2026-07-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8