Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)
VS
CONICETCONICET
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, 110029, IN

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.icmr.nic.in
717/1000Moderate

The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), the apex body in India for the formulation, coordination and promotion of biomedical research, is one of the oldest and largest medical research bodies in the world. The ICMR is funded by the Government of India through the...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:2,708
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
CONICET

CONICET

Godoy Cruz 2290, CABA, C1425FQB, AR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.conicet.gov.ar
782/1000Fair

El Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET) es el principal organismo dedicado a la promoción de la ciencia y la tecnología en la Argentina. Su actividad se desarrolla en cuatro grandes áreas: • Ciencias agrarias, ingeniería y de materiales •...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:13,752
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CONICET

CONICET

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CONICET in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CONICET (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CONICET cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IND224261222
CONICET

CONICET

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) company and CONICET company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and CONICET, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) or CONICET ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) or CONICET ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and CONICET, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) and CONICET, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1