Comparison Overview
IBM

IBM
International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US
Last Update: 15/09/2026
At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and co...

Persistent Systems
Bhageerath, 402 E, Senapati Bapat Road, Pune, Maharashtra, IN, 411016
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are an AI-led, platform-driven Digital Engineering and Enterprise Modernization partner, combining deep technical expertise and industry experience to help our clients anticipate what’s next. Our offerings and proven solutions create a unique competitive advantage fo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

IBM







Persistent Systems






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
IBM has 705.37% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Persistent Systems in 2026.
Incident History - IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Persistent Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Persistent Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

IBM

Persistent Systems
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.
Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.
Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.
Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.
Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/blob/19b5b74faa78d0816b8d4d4c7d7543fc3520678c/vibe/core/git/repo.py#L411-L431
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/commit/c069ffa1e12fb5f2487b489217c40ab97721d553
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/issues/996
- https://github.com/mistralai/mistral-vibe/releases/tag/v2.25.5
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/mistral-vibe-before-2.25.5-remote-code-execution-via-git-post-checkout