Comparison Overview

IBM

VS

FIS

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 700 and 749

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and consulting, then we want to work with you. We're here to help every creator turn their "what if" into what is. Let's create something that will change everything.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 341,860
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

FIS

601 Riverside Ave, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 800 and 849

Unlocking financial technology. Bringing the world’s money into harmony. At FIS, we advance the way the world pays, banks, and invests. With decades of expertise, we provide financial technology solutions to financial institutions, businesses, and developers. Headquartered in Jacksonville, Florida, we’re a proud member of the Fortune 500® and the Standard & Poor’s 500® Index. Let's innovate together.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 45,534
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fis.jpeg
FIS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IBM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FIS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IBM in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for FIS in 2026.

Incident History — IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FIS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FIS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: AI supply chain and model attacks
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fis.jpeg
FIS
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Software Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

FIS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IBM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IBM company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to FIS company.

In the current year, FIS company and IBM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither FIS company nor IBM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

IBM company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other FIS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IBM company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while FIS company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both IBM company and FIS company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither IBM nor FIS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IBM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FIS company.

IBM company employs more people globally than FIS company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither IBM nor FIS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IBM nor FIS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IBM nor FIS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IBM nor FIS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IBM nor FIS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IBM nor FIS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N