Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hyperia Banque du DirigeantHyperia Banque du Dirigeant
VS
Crédit MutuelCrédit Mutuel
Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant

Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant

116, Cours Lafayette, Lyon, 69003, FR

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile

Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant s’adresse aux dirigeants actionnaires. Nous sommes à vos côtés dans le développement, la gestion et la valorisation de votre patrimoine sur le long terme. Pour nous, l’interdépendance des décisions entre les deux périmètres, privé et professi...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Crédit Mutuel

Crédit Mutuel

46 rue Bastion, Paris, 75017, FR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.creditmutuel.com
763/1000Fair

Un modèle mutualiste au service des clients et des salariés. Réseau bancaire mutualiste constitué de 2124 Caisses locales le Crédit Mutuel se compose de 18 fédérations régionales, couvrant tout le territoire français. Société de personnes et non de capitaux, le Crédi...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:15,406
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant

Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Crédit Mutuel

Crédit Mutuel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crédit Mutuel in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Crédit Mutuel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crédit Mutuel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant

Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Crédit Mutuel

Crédit Mutuel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LA-CAICRE1766406599

FAQ

Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant company and Crédit Mutuel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant and Crédit Mutuel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant and Crédit Mutuel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant or Crédit Mutuel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant or Crédit Mutuel ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant and Crédit Mutuel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hyperia Banque du Dirigeant and Crédit Mutuel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1