Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HYDAC Brasil / BrazilHYDAC Brasil / Brazil
VS
ABBABB
HYDAC Brasil / Brazil

HYDAC Brasil / Brazil

Estrada Fukutaro Yida, 225, São Bernardo do Campo, 09852-060, BR

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hydac.com.br
751/1000Fair

A Hydac é uma empresa multinacional presente praticamente no mundo inteiro com uma vasta gama de produtos que abrangem toda técnica de fluidos. A nossa oferta de produtos vai desde componentes passando por subsistemas até complexas unidades de acionamento controladas e...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ABB

ABB

Affolternstrasse 44, Zurich, 8050, CH

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://social.abb/website
815/1000Good

ABB is a technology leader in electrification and automation, enabling a more sustainable and resource-efficient future. The company’s solutions connect engineering know-how and software to optimize how things are manufactured, moved, powered and operated. Building on o...

NAICS:33325
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:134,646
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HYDAC Brasil / Brazil

HYDAC Brasil / Brazil

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ABB

ABB

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HYDAC Brasil / Brazil in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Automation Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABB in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HYDAC Brasil / Brazil (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HYDAC Brasil / Brazil cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ABB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HYDAC Brasil / Brazil

HYDAC Brasil / Brazil

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ABB

ABB

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABB02812623
🔒 Incident : Breach
ABB225090125

FAQ

Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil company and ABB company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil and ABB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil and ABB, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HYDAC Brasil / Brazil or ABB ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HYDAC Brasil / Brazil or ABB ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil and ABB, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HYDAC Brasil / Brazil and ABB, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA