Comparison Overview
Hyatt Regency

Hyatt Regency
Chicago, us
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Welcome to Hyatt Regency hotels, where connections flow seamlessly whether you’re traveling for business or leisure. With more than 150 hotels in over 30 countries, Hyatt Regency is a welcome place for convention goers, business travelers, and leisure seekers alike. ...

Travel + Leisure Co.
6277 Sea Harbor Dr, Orlando, Florida, US, 32821
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Travel + Leisure Co., the world's leading vacation ownership and membership travel company, provides more than six million vacations to travelers every year. The company’s extensive Vacation Ownership portfolio includes trusted and iconic vacation club brands with a com...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Hyatt Regency







Travel + Leisure Co.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hyatt Regency in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Travel + Leisure Co. in 2026.
Incident History - Hyatt Regency (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hyatt Regency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Travel + Leisure Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Travel + Leisure Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Hyatt Regency

Travel + Leisure Co.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.