Comparison Overview
Hyatt Regency

Hyatt Regency
Chicago, us
Last Update: 28/03/2026
Welcome to Hyatt Regency hotels, where connections flow seamlessly whether you’re traveling for business or leisure. With more than 150 hotels in over 30 countries, Hyatt Regency is a welcome place for convention goers, business travelers, and leisure seekers alike. ...

Radisson Hotel Group
44 Avenue du Bourget, Brussels, B-1130, BE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Radisson Hotel Group is an international hotel group, operating in EMEA and APAC with over 1,320 hotels in operation and under development in +95 countries. The international hotel group is rapidly expanding with a plan to significantly grow the portfolio. The Group’s o...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Hyatt Regency







Radisson Hotel Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hyatt Regency in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Radisson Hotel Group in 2026.
Incident History - Hyatt Regency (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hyatt Regency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Radisson Hotel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Radisson Hotel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Hyatt Regency

Radisson Hotel Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.