Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hyatt Regency San AntonioHyatt Regency San Antonio
VS
HyattHyatt
Hyatt Regency San Antonio

Hyatt Regency San Antonio

123 Losoya St, San Antonio, Texas, 78205, US

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile

Hyatt Regency San Antonio Riverwalk 123 Losoya Street San Antonio, Texas, USA, 78205 Tel: +1 210 222 1234

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:48
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Hyatt

Hyatt

150 N Riverside Plaza, Chicago, IL, US, 60606

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.hyatt.com
568/1000Very Poor

Hyatt is guided by its purpose: to care for people so they can be their best. Hyatt’s portfolio includes 1,000+ hotel and all-inclusive properties in over 75 countries across 6 continents. Hyatt’s offerings include brands in the Timeless Collection, including Park Hyatt...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:89,774
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hyatt Regency San Antonio

Hyatt Regency San Antonio

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Hyatt

Hyatt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyatt Regency San Antonio in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hyatt in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hyatt Regency San Antonio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyatt Regency San Antonio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Hyatt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hyatt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hyatt Regency San Antonio

Hyatt Regency San Antonio

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Hyatt

Hyatt

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FOHNORHYAOMN1769001286
🔒 Incident : Breach
NORKFCFOHTACHYA1769001351
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HYA1768842036

FAQ

Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio company and Hyatt company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio and Hyatt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio and Hyatt, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hyatt Regency San Antonio or Hyatt ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hyatt Regency San Antonio or Hyatt ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio and Hyatt, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hyatt Regency San Antonio and Hyatt, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA