Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HYATT HotelsHYATT Hotels
VS
Caesars EntertainmentCaesars Entertainment
HYATT Hotels

HYATT Hotels

N/A

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
690/1000Weak

Immerse yourself with the places and people whose every mission is to make the most of your stay. You may be staying with us for an important meeting, to explore a new city, or to reconnect with old friends. No matter the reason, you’ll find yourself surrounded by enthu...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:929
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment

One Caesars Palace Drive, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89109

Last Update: 10/09/2026

View Profile
416/1000Critical

Caesars Entertainment, Inc. is the largest casino-entertainment Company in the U.S. and one of the world's most diversified casino-entertainment providers. Since its beginning in Reno, NV, in 1937, Caesars Entertainment, Inc. has grown through development of new resorts...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:18,132
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HYATT Hotels

HYATT Hotels

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HYATT Hotels in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

Caesars Entertainment has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - HYATT Hotels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HYATT Hotels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Caesars Entertainment (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caesars Entertainment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HYATT Hotels

HYATT Hotels

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FOHKFCNORHYAOMN1769001235
Caesars Entertainment

Caesars Entertainment

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
FEDTHECAEIDS1788312186
🔒 Incident : Breach
CAE1779906558
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MGMCAEORAWYN1771962331

FAQ

Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HYATT Hotels company and Caesars Entertainment company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HYATT Hotels and Caesars Entertainment, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HYATT Hotels and Caesars Entertainment, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HYATT Hotels or Caesars Entertainment ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HYATT Hotels or Caesars Entertainment ?
Between HYATT Hotels and Caesars Entertainment, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HYATT Hotels and Caesars Entertainment, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8