PHHR
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
hvac-refrigeration-parker-hannifin
Employees number:
None employees
Number of followers:
2,800
NAICS:
3334
Industry Type:
Homepage:
parker.com
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
PAR_2244790
Scan Status:
In-progress
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration Company CyberSecurity Posture
parker.com
KEEPING CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEMS UP AND RUNNING Parker offers commercial, automotive and residential air conditioning and refrigerant equipment manufacturers and technicians a wide selection of robust solutions for industrial, transport, off-road, food retail and similar environments where dependable, precision cooling is necessary. Its industry-standard, form-, fit- and function-qualified controls, controllers, filtration media, filter-driers, valves, chillers, air coolers, liquid coolers and other systems and components are ideal for both OEM or field-replacement applications.
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
PHHR Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 749
PHHR
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
PHHR Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
PHHR
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
PHHR Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
3
Attack Types
2
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: The California Office of the Attorney General reported that Parker-Hannifin Corporation experienced a data breach caused by unauthorized access to its IT systems between March 11, 2022, and March 14, 2022. The breach potentially exposed personal information of current and former employees, including Social Security numbers and financial account information. The breach was reported on May 12, 2022.
Parker Hannifin
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks
Description: Parker Hannifin Corp. suffered a third-party data breach on its systems that compromised the personal information of its own employees. The company along with law enforcement and cybersecurity experts investigated the extent of the incident. The attack only compromised the employee data and had no significant financial or operational impact.
Parker Hannifin (Parker)
Ransomware
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: Parker Hannifin, a US-based global leader in motion and control technologies (e.g., aerospace, industrial manufacturing, and critical infrastructure), was targeted by the **Conti ransomware gang** in a high-profile attack. The incident disrupted operations, encrypted critical systems, and led to significant financial and operational losses. Conti, known for its double-extortion tactics, not only encrypted Parker’s data but also exfiltrated sensitive information, threatening to leak it unless a ransom was paid. The attack aligns with Conti’s broader campaign against **critical national infrastructure (CNI)**, causing cumulative losses exceeding **$150 million** across its 1,000+ global victims.The breach forced Parker to initiate containment measures, including system isolations and forensic investigations, while facing potential reputational damage and supply chain disruptions. Conti’s targeting of CNI—such as manufacturing giants like Parker—highlights the group’s capability to threaten **organizational existence** by crippling core operations, stealing proprietary data (e.g., patents, trade secrets), and demanding ransoms under coercion. The US Department of Justice later linked Conti to **national security risks**, given its repeated attacks on sectors vital to economic and public safety. Parker’s case exemplifies the escalating stakes of ransomware, where cybercriminal syndicates like Conti weaponize encryption and data theft to extort victims while destabilizing industries.
PHHR Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for PHHR
Incidents vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration in 2025.
Incident Types PHHR vs HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration in 2025.
Incident History — PHHR (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PHHR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
PHHR Company Subsidiaries
KEEPING CLIMATE CONTROL SYSTEMS UP AND RUNNING Parker offers commercial, automotive and residential air conditioning and refrigerant equipment manufacturers and technicians a wide selection of robust solutions for industrial, transport, off-road, food retail and similar environments where dependable, precision cooling is necessary. Its industry-standard, form-, fit- and function-qualified controls, controllers, filtration media, filter-driers, valves, chillers, air coolers, liquid coolers and other systems and components are ideal for both OEM or field-replacement applications.
Loading...
PHHR Similar Companies
Loading...
.png)
PHHR CyberSecurity News
August 22, 2025 07:00 AM
Parker-Hannifin Corp SEC 10-K Report
Parker-Hannifin Corporation, a global leader in motion and control technologies, has released its 2025 Form 10-K report, detailing the...
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
PHHR CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration
The official website of Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration is https://www.parker.com/us/en/industries/hvacr.html.
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 746, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
How many security badges does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration operates primarily in the HVAC and Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing industry.
Number of Employees at Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration employs approximately None employees people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration’s LinkedIn Followers
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 2,800 followers.
NAICS Classification of Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration is classified under the NAICS code 3334, which corresponds to Ventilation, Heating, Air-Conditioning, and Commercial Refrigeration Equipment Manufacturing.
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/hvac-refrigeration-parker-hannifin.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration
As of November 28, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration has experienced 3 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration has an estimated 151 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach and Ransomware.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration ?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $150 million.
How does Parker Hannifin | HVAC and Refrigeration detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with cybersecurity experts, and and third party assistance with fbi cyber division, third party assistance with irish law enforcement, and and communication strategy with public disclosure by us department of justice and fbi warnings to organizations..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Parker Hannifin Corp. Third-Party Data Breach
Description: Parker Hannifin Corp. suffered a third-party data breach on its systems that compromised the personal information of its own employees. The company along with law enforcement and cybersecurity experts investigated the extent of the incident. The attack only compromised the employee data and had no significant financial or operational impact.
Type: Data Breach
Title: Parker-Hannifin Corporation Data Breach
Description: Unauthorized access to IT systems potentially exposed personal information of current and former employees, including Social Security numbers and financial account information.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2022-05-12
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Title: Ukrainian Man Extradited and Charged in Conti Ransomware Conspiracy
Description: A Ukrainian man, Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko, was extradited from Ireland and charged in the US with conspiracy to deploy Conti ransomware. He allegedly conspired with others to hack into victims’ computers, steal and encrypt their data, and extort ransom payments in cryptocurrency. Conti targeted over 1000 corporate victims globally, including critical national infrastructure (CNI), causing losses of at least $150 million. Lytvynenko is accused of controlling stolen data and managing ransom notes, with his activities spanning from 2020 to July 2022. He was arrested in Ireland in July 2023 and faces charges of computer fraud conspiracy and wire fraud conspiracy, with a potential maximum sentence of 25 years if convicted.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-10-06
Type: ransomware
Attack Vector: phishingexploiting vulnerabilitiesmalware deployment
Threat Actor: Conti Ransomware Group
Motivation: financial gaincybercrime
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PAR134826522
Data Compromised: Employee personal information
Incident : Data Breach PAR448072625
Data Compromised: Social security numbers, Financial account information
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Financial Loss: $150 million (estimated total across all Conti victims)
Systems Affected: 1000+ corporate victims globally (including critical national infrastructure)
Operational Impact: Significant disruption to critical national infrastructure and corporate operations
Revenue Loss: $500,000+ (from two victims in the Middle District of Tennessee)
Brand Reputation Impact: High (due to public disclosure of stolen data and association with Conti)
Legal Liabilities: Potential lawsuits and regulatory actions for affected organizations
Identity Theft Risk: High (due to stolen data)
Payment Information Risk: High (ransomware often targets financial data)
What is the average financial loss per incident ?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $50.00 million.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Personal Information, Social Security Numbers, Financial Account Information, , Corporate Data, Personally Identifiable Information (Pii), Financial Data, Sensitive Business Information and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PAR134826522
Entity Name: Parker Hannifin Corp.
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Manufacturing
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Entity Name: Parker Hannifin (US Manufacturing Giant)
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Manufacturing
Location: United States
Size: Large
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Entity Name: Unnamed Victims in Middle District of Tennessee
Entity Type: Corporation, Organization
Location: Tennessee, United States
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Entity Name: 1000+ Global Corporate Victims
Entity Type: Corporation, Government, Critical National Infrastructure
Location: Global (dozens of countries, nearly all US states)
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PAR134826522
Third Party Assistance: Cybersecurity Experts.
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Third Party Assistance: Fbi Cyber Division, Irish Law Enforcement.
Communication Strategy: Public disclosure by US Department of Justice and FBI warnings to organizations
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Cybersecurity Experts, , FBI Cyber Division, Irish Law Enforcement, .
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach PAR134826522
Type of Data Compromised: Personal Information
Incident : Data Breach PAR448072625
Type of Data Compromised: Social security numbers, Financial account information
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Type of Data Compromised: Corporate data, Personally identifiable information (pii), Financial data, Sensitive business information
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Encryption: True
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Ransom Paid: $500,000+ (in cryptocurrency from two victims in Tennessee)
Ransomware Strain: Conti
Data Encryption: True
Data Exfiltration: True
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Legal Actions: Criminal charges against Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko (computer fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy),
How does the company ensure compliance with regulatory requirements ?
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through Criminal charges against Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko (computer fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Lessons Learned: The Conti ransomware operation highlights the global reach and severe financial/operational impact of ransomware attacks, particularly on critical infrastructure. The case underscores the importance of international law enforcement collaboration (e.g., US-Ireland extradition) in combating cybercrime. Organizations are urged to implement robust cybersecurity measures, including employee training, vulnerability management, and incident response planning, to mitigate ransomware risks. The public doxxing of Conti by a Ukrainian researcher also demonstrates the potential for vigilante actions in response to cybercriminal activities tied to geopolitical conflicts.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Recommendations: Report ransomware intrusions immediately to local FBI field offices or relevant law enforcement agencies., Implement multi-layered defenses, including endpoint detection and response (EDR), network segmentation, and regular backups., Conduct frequent security awareness training to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks., Monitor dark web forums for signs of stolen data or ransomware negotiations., Develop and test incident response plans to ensure rapid containment and recovery., Collaborate with cybersecurity firms and threat intelligence providers to stay ahead of emerging ransomware strains.Report ransomware intrusions immediately to local FBI field offices or relevant law enforcement agencies., Implement multi-layered defenses, including endpoint detection and response (EDR), network segmentation, and regular backups., Conduct frequent security awareness training to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks., Monitor dark web forums for signs of stolen data or ransomware negotiations., Develop and test incident response plans to ensure rapid containment and recovery., Collaborate with cybersecurity firms and threat intelligence providers to stay ahead of emerging ransomware strains.Report ransomware intrusions immediately to local FBI field offices or relevant law enforcement agencies., Implement multi-layered defenses, including endpoint detection and response (EDR), network segmentation, and regular backups., Conduct frequent security awareness training to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks., Monitor dark web forums for signs of stolen data or ransomware negotiations., Develop and test incident response plans to ensure rapid containment and recovery., Collaborate with cybersecurity firms and threat intelligence providers to stay ahead of emerging ransomware strains.Report ransomware intrusions immediately to local FBI field offices or relevant law enforcement agencies., Implement multi-layered defenses, including endpoint detection and response (EDR), network segmentation, and regular backups., Conduct frequent security awareness training to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks., Monitor dark web forums for signs of stolen data or ransomware negotiations., Develop and test incident response plans to ensure rapid containment and recovery., Collaborate with cybersecurity firms and threat intelligence providers to stay ahead of emerging ransomware strains.Report ransomware intrusions immediately to local FBI field offices or relevant law enforcement agencies., Implement multi-layered defenses, including endpoint detection and response (EDR), network segmentation, and regular backups., Conduct frequent security awareness training to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks., Monitor dark web forums for signs of stolen data or ransomware negotiations., Develop and test incident response plans to ensure rapid containment and recovery., Collaborate with cybersecurity firms and threat intelligence providers to stay ahead of emerging ransomware strains.Report ransomware intrusions immediately to local FBI field offices or relevant law enforcement agencies., Implement multi-layered defenses, including endpoint detection and response (EDR), network segmentation, and regular backups., Conduct frequent security awareness training to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks., Monitor dark web forums for signs of stolen data or ransomware negotiations., Develop and test incident response plans to ensure rapid containment and recovery., Collaborate with cybersecurity firms and threat intelligence providers to stay ahead of emerging ransomware strains.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The Conti ransomware operation highlights the global reach and severe financial/operational impact of ransomware attacks, particularly on critical infrastructure. The case underscores the importance of international law enforcement collaboration (e.g., US-Ireland extradition) in combating cybercrime. Organizations are urged to implement robust cybersecurity measures, including employee training, vulnerability management, and incident response planning, to mitigate ransomware risks. The public doxxing of Conti by a Ukrainian researcher also demonstrates the potential for vigilante actions in response to cybercriminal activities tied to geopolitical conflicts.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach PAR448072625
Source: California Office of the Attorney General
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Source: US Department of Justice (DoJ) Press Release
Date Accessed: 2023-10-06
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Source: Infosecurity Magazine - 'Ukrainian Man Extradited to US Over Conti Ransomware Charges'
URL: https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/ukrainian-conti-ransomware-extradited/
Date Accessed: 2023-10-06
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Source: Previous Conti Incident: US Manufacturing Giant Parker Hit by Conti Ransomware Gang
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: California Office of the Attorney General, and Source: US Department of Justice (DoJ) Press ReleaseDate Accessed: 2023-10-06, and Source: FBI Cyber Division StatementDate Accessed: 2023-10-06, and Source: Infosecurity Magazine - 'Ukrainian Man Extradited to US Over Conti Ransomware Charges'Url: https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/ukrainian-conti-ransomware-extradited/Date Accessed: 2023-10-06, and Source: Previous Conti Incident: US Manufacturing Giant Parker Hit by Conti Ransomware Gang.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Investigation Status: Ongoing (Lytvynenko awaiting trial in Tennessee; broader Conti investigations likely continuing)
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Public disclosure by US Department of Justice and FBI warnings to organizations.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Stakeholder Advisories: FBI and DoJ have advised organizations to remain vigilant and report ransomware incidents promptly.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: was FBI and DoJ have advised organizations to remain vigilant and report ransomware incidents promptly..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
High Value Targets: Corporate Networks, Critical National Infrastructure,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Corporate Networks, Critical National Infrastructure,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : ransomware PAR0432504110325
Root Causes: Exploitation Of Unpatched Vulnerabilities Or Weak Credentials In Victim Systems., Successful Phishing Or Social Engineering Attacks To Gain Initial Access., Lack Of Adequate Endpoint Protection Or Ransomware-Specific Defenses., Insufficient Employee Training On Cybersecurity Best Practices., Geopolitical Motivations (E.G., Conti'S Pro-Russia Stance) Potentially Influencing Targeting Or Operational Security.,
Corrective Actions: Patch Management And Vulnerability Remediation Programs., Deployment Of Advanced Threat Detection Tools (E.G., Edr, Xdr)., Enhanced Email Security And Anti-Phishing Measures., Regular Security Audits And Penetration Testing., Incident Response Tabletop Exercises To Prepare For Ransomware Scenarios., Collaboration With Law Enforcement And Cybersecurity Information Sharing Organizations (E.G., Isacs).,
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Cybersecurity Experts, , Fbi Cyber Division, Irish Law Enforcement, .
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Patch Management And Vulnerability Remediation Programs., Deployment Of Advanced Threat Detection Tools (E.G., Edr, Xdr)., Enhanced Email Security And Anti-Phishing Measures., Regular Security Audits And Penetration Testing., Incident Response Tabletop Exercises To Prepare For Ransomware Scenarios., Collaboration With Law Enforcement And Cybersecurity Information Sharing Organizations (E.G., Isacs)., .
Additional Questions
General Information
Has the company ever paid ransoms ?
Ransom Payment History: The company has Paid ransoms in the past.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Conti Ransomware Group.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-10-06.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident ?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was $150 million (estimated total across all Conti victims).
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Employee Personal Information, , Social Security numbers, financial account information, and .
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was cybersecurity experts, , fbi cyber division, irish law enforcement, .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were financial account information, Employee Personal Information and Social Security numbers.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident ?
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was $500,000+ (in cryptocurrency from two victims in Tennessee).
Regulatory Compliance
What was the most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation ?
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was Criminal charges against Oleksii Oleksiyovych Lytvynenko (computer fraud conspiracy, wire fraud conspiracy), .
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was The Conti ransomware operation highlights the global reach and severe financial/operational impact of ransomware attacks, particularly on critical infrastructure. The case underscores the importance of international law enforcement collaboration (e.g., US-Ireland extradition) in combating cybercrime. Organizations are urged to implement robust cybersecurity measures, including employee training, vulnerability management, and incident response planning, to mitigate ransomware risks. The public doxxing of Conti by a Ukrainian researcher also demonstrates the potential for vigilante actions in response to cybercriminal activities tied to geopolitical conflicts.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Collaborate with cybersecurity firms and threat intelligence providers to stay ahead of emerging ransomware strains., Report ransomware intrusions immediately to local FBI field offices or relevant law enforcement agencies., Develop and test incident response plans to ensure rapid containment and recovery., Implement multi-layered defenses, including endpoint detection and response (EDR), network segmentation, and regular backups., Conduct frequent security awareness training to prevent phishing and social engineering attacks. and Monitor dark web forums for signs of stolen data or ransomware negotiations..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are FBI Cyber Division Statement, Infosecurity Magazine - 'Ukrainian Man Extradited to US Over Conti Ransomware Charges', US Department of Justice (DoJ) Press Release, California Office of the Attorney General and Previous Conti Incident: US Manufacturing Giant Parker Hit by Conti Ransomware Gang.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/ukrainian-conti-ransomware-extradited/ .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing (Lytvynenko awaiting trial in Tennessee; broader Conti investigations likely continuing).
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was FBI and DoJ have advised organizations to remain vigilant and report ransomware incidents promptly., .
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=hvac-refrigeration-parker-hannifin' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
