Comparison Overview

Hutchinson

VS

Tenneco

Hutchinson

2, Rue de Balzac, Paris, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hutchinson.com

Hutchinson designs and produces customized materials and connected solutions to respond to the needs of its global customers, on land, in the air and at sea. A global leader in vibration control, fluid management and sealing system technologies, our Group stands out with a multiple market offering spanning multiple areas of expertise and delivering synergies and value-added. Hutchinson reported revenues of €5 billion in 2024 and has more than 40,000 employees in 25 countries. Our ambition is to contribute to safer, more comfortable and more responsible mobility for the future.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 12,282
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Tenneco

15701 Technology Dr., Northville, Michigan, 48168, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tenneco.com

Driven by our Core Values and our winning mindset, we’re relentless in our pursuit to become the most trusted partner and best manufacturer and distributer to the transportation industry. Our employees are the changemakers of this ambition, bringing drive, passion and dedication to everything we do. And at the center of it all? Our customers – because when they win, we all win.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 26,718
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hutchinson.jpeg
Hutchinson
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenneco.jpeg
Tenneco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hutchinson
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tenneco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hutchinson in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenneco in 2025.

Incident History — Hutchinson (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hutchinson cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tenneco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenneco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hutchinson.jpeg
Hutchinson
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tenneco.jpeg
Tenneco
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Tenneco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hutchinson company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tenneco company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hutchinson company.

In the current year, Tenneco company and Hutchinson company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tenneco company nor Hutchinson company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tenneco company nor Hutchinson company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tenneco company nor Hutchinson company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hutchinson company nor Tenneco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hutchinson nor Tenneco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Tenneco company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hutchinson company.

Tenneco company employs more people globally than Hutchinson company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither Hutchinson nor Tenneco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Tenneco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Tenneco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Tenneco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Tenneco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hutchinson nor Tenneco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References