Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HurtigrutenHurtigruten
VS
MSC CruisesMSC Cruises
Hurtigruten

Hurtigruten

Langkaia 1, None, Oslo, Oslo, NO, 0150

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://hurtigruten.com
733/1000Moderate

Hurtigruten is a Norwegian shipping and travel company that sails the legendary coastal route to 34 ports between Kirkenes and Bergen – often referred to as "the world’s most beautiful sea voyage." For over 130 years, we have safely transported local passengers, essenti...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:1,516
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
MSC Cruises

MSC Cruises

Avenue Eugene Pittard, Geneva, 1206, CH

Last Update: 29/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.msccruises.com/
801/1000Good

Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, MSC Cruises is the world’s third largest cruise lines and the market leader in Europe, South America, the Middle East and Southern Africa, with a strong and growing presence in North America and the Far East. The MSC Cruises fleet ...

NAICS:5615
NAICS Definition:Travel Arrangement and Reservation Services
Employees:20,291
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hurtigruten

Hurtigruten

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MSC Cruises

MSC Cruises

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hurtigruten in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Travel Arrangements Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSC Cruises in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hurtigruten (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hurtigruten cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MSC Cruises (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSC Cruises cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hurtigruten

Hurtigruten

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HUR710072825
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HUR623092125
MSC Cruises

MSC Cruises

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hurtigruten company and MSC Cruises company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hurtigruten and MSC Cruises, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hurtigruten and MSC Cruises, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hurtigruten or MSC Cruises ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hurtigruten or MSC Cruises ?
Between Hurtigruten and MSC Cruises, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hurtigruten and MSC Cruises, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2