Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.
VS
TenarisTenaris
Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.

Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.

Av. Las Palmeras 435, San Isidro, Lima, 27, PE

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

Hunt LNG Operating Company (previously COLP S.A.C.) is a Peruvian company and a 100%-owned subsidiary of Hunt Oil Company. Its main purpose is operating, repairing and maintaining any kind of public or private works, directly or through third parties, including (i) ...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:382
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tenaris

Tenaris

2200 West Loop South, Suite 800, Houston, 77027, US

Last Update: 18/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.tenaris.com
793/1000Fair

Tenaris is a leading supplier of tubes and related services for the world’s energy industry and certain other industrial applications. Our mission is to deliver value to our customers through product development, manufacturing excellence, and supply chain management. Te...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:14,031
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.

Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tenaris

Tenaris

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tenaris in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tenaris (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tenaris cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.

Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tenaris

Tenaris

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. company and Tenaris company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. and Tenaris, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. and Tenaris, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. or Tenaris ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. or Tenaris ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. and Tenaris, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hunt LNG Operating Company S.A.C. and Tenaris, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2