Comparison Overview
Huawei Consumer Business Group

Huawei Consumer Business Group
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Bantian, Longgang District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, CN
Last Update: 27/01/2026
Huawei Technologies Co. offers products and services in more than 170 countries, serving a third of the world’s population. As one of Huawei’s three primary business units, Huawei Consumer Business Group became the world’s third-biggest smartphone maker in 2015, deliver...

Samsung Electronics
129 Samsung-ro, Suwon-Si, 443-742, KR
Last Update: 19/06/2026
Samsung Electronics is a global leader in technology, opening new possibilities for people everywhere. Through relentless innovation and discovery, we are transforming the worlds of TVs, smartphones, wearable devices, tablets, digital appliances, network systems, medica...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Huawei Consumer Business Group







Samsung Electronics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Huawei Consumer Business Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Computers and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
Samsung Electronics has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Huawei Consumer Business Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Huawei Consumer Business Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Samsung Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Samsung Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Huawei Consumer Business Group

Samsung Electronics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.