Comparison Overview
HSBC Asset Management

HSBC Asset Management
8 Canada Square, London, E14 5EQ, GB
Last Update: 09/03/2026
At HSBC Asset Management, our network of experts, culture of collaboration and disciplined approach are your access to a world of investment opportunities. We leverage our international presence and experience across developed and emerging economies to help investors na...

Sonae
Maia, Porto, 4470-177, PT
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Sonae exists to create a lasting positive impact on businesses, people, communities and on the planet. Managing a diverse portfolio of businesses in retail, financial services, technology, investments, real estate and telecommunications, Sonae makes the most of its ex...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

HSBC Asset Management







Sonae






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HSBC Asset Management in 2026.
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sonae in 2026.
Incident History - HSBC Asset Management (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HSBC Asset Management cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sonae (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sonae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

HSBC Asset Management

Sonae
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.