Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HP Hood LLCHP Hood LLC
VS
Minerva FoodsMinerva Foods
HP Hood LLC

HP Hood LLC

6 Kimball Lane, Lynnfield, 01940, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.hphood.com
734/1000Moderate

For more than 175 years, the name Hood® has been synonymous with fresh, quality dairy products that taste great. Founded in 1846 in Charlestown, Massachusetts, Hood is now one of the largest dairy processors in the country with 12 manufacturing plants across the United ...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:2,003
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Minerva Foods

Minerva Foods

Avenida Antônio Manço Bernardes S/N - Rotatória Família Vilela de Queiroz, Barretos, 14781-545, BR

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.minervafoods.com
748/1000Moderate

Minerva Foods is the leader in beef exports in South America and is also present in the processed meat segment, selling its products to more than 100 countries. In addition to Brazil, Minerva Foods has productive units in Paraguay, Argentina, Colombia, Paraguay, Uruguay...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:12,488
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HP Hood LLC

HP Hood LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Minerva Foods

Minerva Foods

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HP Hood LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Minerva Foods in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HP Hood LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HP Hood LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Minerva Foods (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Minerva Foods cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HP Hood LLC

HP Hood LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HP-837072825
Minerva Foods

Minerva Foods

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HP Hood LLC company and Minerva Foods company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HP Hood LLC and Minerva Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HP Hood LLC and Minerva Foods, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HP Hood LLC or Minerva Foods ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HP Hood LLC or Minerva Foods ?
Between HP Hood LLC and Minerva Foods, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HP Hood LLC and Minerva Foods, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA