Comparison Overview
Hospital da Luz
Hospital da Luz
Avenida Lusíada, 100, Lisboa, 1500-650, PT
Last Update: 01/04/2026
A rede Hospital da Luz, do Grupo Luz Saúde, é uma das maiores e mais completas redes de cuidados de saúde privados em Portugal. É atualmente constituída por 31 hospitais e clínicas que se destacam pela qualidade e inovação dos serviços prestados. Estamos presentes nas ...
Oregon Health & Science University
3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, Oregon, US, 97239
Last Update: 13/09/2026
At OHSU, we deliver breakthroughs for better health. We're driven by the belief that better health starts with innovations in the lab, in the classroom, at the bedside and in our communities. From cancer to Alzheimer's to cardiovascular care, we collaborate every day ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Hospital da Luz
Oregon Health & Science University
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hospital da Luz in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Oregon Health & Science University in 2026.
Incident History - Hospital da Luz (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hospital da Luz cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Oregon Health & Science University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Oregon Health & Science University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Hospital da Luz
Oregon Health & Science University
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.