Comparison Overview
Horizontal
Horizontal
1660 Highway 100 South, St Louis Park, 55416, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Horizontal Inc. offers two distinctive businesses: Horizontal Digital — an experience forward consultancy that uses strategy, technology and creativity to address client marketing needs and opportunities; and Horizontal Talent — a professional staffing firm that pairs b...
Indra
Avda. Bruselas, 35, Madrid, 28108, ES
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Indra Group (https://www.indragroup.com/) is the foremost Spanish multinational and one of the leading European companies that focus on defence and advanced technologies. It stands at the forefront of the defence, space, air traffic management, mobility, and Information...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Horizontal
Indra
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Horizontal in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Indra has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Horizontal (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Horizontal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Horizontal
Indra
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.