Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HOMANN Feinkost GmbHHOMANN Feinkost GmbH
VS
PT SMART TbkPT SMART Tbk
HOMANN Feinkost GmbH

HOMANN Feinkost GmbH

Heinrich-Hamker-Straße 20, Bad Essen, 49152, DE

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.homann-saucen.de
748/1000Moderate

Bereits seit 1876 steht der Name HOMANN für guten Geschmack und hohe Qualität. Seit 2011 schreiben wir als Teil der Unternehmensgruppe Theo Müller diese Tradition fort und sind bestens auf die Zukunft ausgerichtet. Am Standort in Lintorf bei Osnabrück entsteht die moder...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:179
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
PT SMART Tbk

PT SMART Tbk

Jl. M.H. Thamrin No. 51, Jakarta, 10350, ID

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.smart-tbk.com/
787/1000Fair

PT SMART Tbk (SMART) / Sinar Mas Agribusiness and Food adalah salah satu perusahaan publik produk konsumen berbasis kelapa sawit yang terintegrasi dan terkemuka di Indonesia yang berkomitmen pada produksi minyak sawit yang berkelanjutan. Perkebunan kelapa sawit SMART m...

NAICS:311
NAICS Definition:Food Manufacturing
Employees:13,045
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HOMANN Feinkost GmbH

HOMANN Feinkost GmbH

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
PT SMART Tbk

PT SMART Tbk

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HOMANN Feinkost GmbH in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT SMART Tbk in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HOMANN Feinkost GmbH (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HOMANN Feinkost GmbH cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - PT SMART Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT SMART Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HOMANN Feinkost GmbH

HOMANN Feinkost GmbH

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
PT SMART Tbk

PT SMART Tbk

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH company and PT SMART Tbk company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH and PT SMART Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH and PT SMART Tbk, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HOMANN Feinkost GmbH or PT SMART Tbk ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HOMANN Feinkost GmbH or PT SMART Tbk ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH and PT SMART Tbk, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HOMANN Feinkost GmbH and PT SMART Tbk, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8