Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health SolutionsHologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions
VS
BDBD
Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions

Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions

N/A

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.hologic.com
764/1000Fair

Hologic supports women at every stage of life. We develop medical technologies that detect, diagnose and treat health conditions affecting women around the world. Our advancements in diagnostics, gynecological surgical solutions and breast and skeletal health help healt...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BD

BD

1 Becton Drive, Franklin Lakes, 07417, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bd.com
821/1000Good

BD is one of the largest global medical technology companies in the world and is advancing the world of health™ by improving medical discovery, diagnostics and the delivery of care. The company supports the heroes on the frontlines of health care by developing innovativ...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:46,070
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions

Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BD

BD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BD in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions

Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BD

BD

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions company and BD company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions and BD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions and BD, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions or BD ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions or BD ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions and BD, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hologic Breast & Skeletal Health Solutions and BD, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2