Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HollerHoller
VS
Clear Channel EuropeClear Channel Europe
Holler

Holler

Avonmore Road, London, undefined, W14 8HQ, GB

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.holler.co.uk
750/1000Fair

We're a digital agency, part of the Leo Burnett Group, with offices in London, and soon in Chicago and Silicon Valley. We enable brands to realise their ambitions through a digital entertainment strategy. We create and deliver engaging content and make brands fam...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:39
Subsidiaries:86
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Clear Channel Europe

Clear Channel Europe

33 Golden Square, London, England, GB, W1F 9

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Clear Channel Europe is a division of leading global Out of Home media company, Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: CCO). The Clear Channel Europe portfolio spans 14 markets with 260,000 advertising panels. Clear Channel Europe has 2,600 dedicated employees. O...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:15,154
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Holler

Holler

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Clear Channel Europe

Clear Channel Europe

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Holler in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Clear Channel Europe in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Holler (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Holler cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Clear Channel Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Clear Channel Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Holler

Holler

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Clear Channel Europe

Clear Channel Europe

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Holler company and Clear Channel Europe company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Holler and Clear Channel Europe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Holler and Clear Channel Europe, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Holler or Clear Channel Europe ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Holler or Clear Channel Europe ?
Between Holler and Clear Channel Europe, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Holler and Clear Channel Europe, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA