Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hollard InsuranceHollard Insurance
VS
SedgwickSedgwick
Hollard Insurance

Hollard Insurance

22 Oxford Road, Johannesburg, 2193, ZA

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.hollard.co.za
496/1000Critical

Life is full of unsures. That’s why we make it our business to cover you against uncertainties. #InsureYourUnsure with Hollard.

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:5,352
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.sedgwick.com
684/1000Weak

Sedgwick is the world’s leading risk and claims administration partner, helping clients thrive by navigating the unexpected. The company’s expertise, combined with the most advanced AI-enabled technology available, sets the standard for solutions in claims administratio...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:22,216
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hollard Insurance

Hollard Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Hollard Insurance has 25.79% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sedgwick in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hollard Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hollard Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Sedgwick (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sedgwick cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hollard Insurance

Hollard Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HOL1790015448
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HOL1789187522
Sedgwick

Sedgwick

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
SEDSED1767602047
🔒 Incident : Breach
SED549072725

FAQ

Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hollard Insurance company and Sedgwick company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hollard Insurance and Sedgwick, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hollard Insurance and Sedgwick, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hollard Insurance or Sedgwick ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hollard Insurance or Sedgwick ?
Between Hollard Insurance and Sedgwick, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hollard Insurance and Sedgwick, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3