Comparison Overview
Holland & Knight LLP

Holland & Knight LLP
100 N Tampa St, Suite 4100, Tampa, Florida, US
Last Update: 11/10/2026
Holland & Knight is a global law firm with more than 2,200 lawyers and other professionals in 36 offices throughout the world. Holland & Knight provides representation in litigation, business, financial services, healthcare, real estate, wealth and tax, and governmental...

DLA Piper
Global, GB
Last Update: 08/10/2026
DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver excepti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Holland & Knight LLP







DLA Piper






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
Holland & Knight LLP has 30.07% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DLA Piper in 2026.
Incident History - Holland & Knight LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Holland & Knight LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DLA Piper (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DLA Piper cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Holland & Knight LLP

DLA Piper
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.