Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hobart Food Equipment and ServiceHobart Food Equipment and Service
VS
Office DepotOffice Depot
Hobart Food Equipment and Service

Hobart Food Equipment and Service

701 S Ridge Ave, Troy, Ohio, 45373, US

Last Update: 13/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hobartservice.com
762/1000Fair

While running a business you constantly have a million things going on in your operation every day and any one of them can go wrong without notice. You’ve been around the block enough to know how to work-around many of them, but your mission critical foodservice equipm...

NAICS:453
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1,744
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Office Depot

Office Depot

6600 N. Military Trail, Boca Raton, 33496, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://odp.biz/3EXAPqF
757/1000Fair

Office Depot, LLC, an operating company of The ODP Corporation, is a leading specialty retailer providing innovative products and services delivered through a fully integrated omnichannel platform of Office Depot and OfficeMax retail stores and an award-winning online p...

NAICS:45321
NAICS Definition:Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees:32,100
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hobart Food Equipment and Service

Hobart Food Equipment and Service

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Office Depot

Office Depot

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hobart Food Equipment and Service in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Office Depot in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hobart Food Equipment and Service (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hobart Food Equipment and Service cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Office Depot (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Office Depot cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hobart Food Equipment and Service

Hobart Food Equipment and Service

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Office Depot

Office Depot

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service company and Office Depot company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service and Office Depot, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service and Office Depot, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hobart Food Equipment and Service or Office Depot ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hobart Food Equipment and Service or Office Depot ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service and Office Depot, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hobart Food Equipment and Service and Office Depot, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA