Comparison Overview

HMM

VS

Anglo-Eastern

HMM

108 Yeoui-daero, Yeongdengpo-gu, Seoul, KR, 03127
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

We are the global integrated logistics company that provides the utmost services through over a hundred vessels, the networks connecting the world, and our professional experts. As your friendly partner, we constantly strive to grow as a global shipping leader.

NAICS: 483
NAICS Definition: Water Transportation
Employees: 3,275
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Anglo-Eastern

17/F Kingston International Centre, 19 Wang Chiu Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, HK, .
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Anglo-Eastern's rich maritime heritage spans over 50 years of ship management, crew management, cruise & leisure management and technical services. We manage a diverse fleet of vessels worldwide on behalf of our global partners, and uniquely offer both cadet and crew training through our highly regarded maritime academy and strategically located training centres. From humble beginnings to industry pioneer, we are always looking to the future yet are never far from our roots, and it is this distinct blend of proactive forward-thinking and traditional values, coupled with our commitment to developing and nurturing our people and communities, that drives Anglo-Eastern and sets us apart from our peers. Leading with integrity and doing the right things the right way are at the heart of our work ethic and the foundation upon which we are able to build trust, drive performance and shape a better maritime future for generations to follow. Join us on our voyage in delivering excellence. ------------------------ IMPORTANT NOTICE | Anglo-Eastern does NOT use agents, and we do NOT charge fees in exchange for employment or AEMA sponsorship. We offer employment and sponsorship based on merit and suitability. Anyone asking for money in exchange for Anglo-Eastern employment or AEMA sponsorship is a fraudster. Please report such scammers and do NOT make any payments to them. COMMUNITY POLICY | We welcome our followers and other members of the LinkedIn community to comment on our posts and express their views. However, we have a zero-tolerance policy regarding comments that are obscene, threatening, discriminatory or of a harassing nature (including trolling), as well as those that intend to purposely mislead through false claims and misinformation, solicit, phish and/or otherwise scam. Such comments may be reported and/or removed at any time without notice.

NAICS: 483
NAICS Definition: Water Transportation
Employees: 13,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hmmofficial.jpeg
HMM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anglo-eastern.jpeg
Anglo-Eastern
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HMM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Anglo-Eastern
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HMM in 2025.

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anglo-Eastern in 2025.

Incident History — HMM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HMM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Anglo-Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anglo-Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hmmofficial.jpeg
HMM
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2021
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2010
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: spear-phishing, exploitation of known vulnerabilities
Motivation: data theft (documents, email credentials, network access passwords) for espionage purposes
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anglo-eastern.jpeg
Anglo-Eastern
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

HMM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anglo-Eastern company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

HMM company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Anglo-Eastern company.

In the current year, Anglo-Eastern company and HMM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Anglo-Eastern company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while HMM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Anglo-Eastern company nor HMM company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

HMM company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Anglo-Eastern company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HMM company nor Anglo-Eastern company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HMM nor Anglo-Eastern holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HMM company nor Anglo-Eastern company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Anglo-Eastern company employs more people globally than HMM company, reflecting its scale as a Maritime Transportation.

Neither HMM nor Anglo-Eastern holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HMM nor Anglo-Eastern holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HMM nor Anglo-Eastern holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HMM nor Anglo-Eastern holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HMM nor Anglo-Eastern holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HMM nor Anglo-Eastern holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L