Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HKT HomeHKT Home
VS
HuaweiHuawei
HKT Home

HKT Home

PCCW Tower, Taikoo Place, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong Island, undefined, 00000, HK

Last Update: 17/12/2025

View Profile
752/1000Fair

HKT Home creates an ideal space for work, learning, entertainment and gaming at home. With our extensive fibre-to-the-home connectivity and wireless infrastructure, we offer high-quality broadband for gaming and streaming, a broad suite of world-class entertainment, liv...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:42
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Huawei

Huawei

Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, 518129, CN

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.huawei.com/en/
798/1000Fair

Huawei is a leading global provider of information and communications technology (ICT) infrastructure and smart devices. With integrated solutions across four key domains – telecom networks, IT, smart devices, and cloud services – we are committed to bringing digital to...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:141,559
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HKT Home

HKT Home

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Huawei

Huawei

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HKT Home in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Huawei has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - HKT Home (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HKT Home cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Huawei (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Huawei cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HKT Home

HKT Home

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Huawei

Huawei

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HUATP-1785227245
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
UNIHUAAME1781792980
🔒 Incident : Breach
HUA1993019100625

FAQ

Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HKT Home company and Huawei company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HKT Home and Huawei, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HKT Home and Huawei, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HKT Home or Huawei ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HKT Home or Huawei ?
Between HKT Home and Huawei, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HKT Home and Huawei, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3