Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HKT Digital Ventures - FintechHKT Digital Ventures - Fintech
VS
TVS Credit Services Ltd.TVS Credit Services Ltd.
HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech

HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech

Hong Kong, N/A, HK

Last Update: 08/01/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Being the Fintech arm of HKT Digital Ventures, we provide a wide range of service offerings including mobile payments, merchant services, O2O solutions, insurance, etc., under the banner of Tap & Go, HKT Merchant Services and HKT Flexi. We are committed to serving the c...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:42
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TVS Credit Services Ltd.

TVS Credit Services Ltd.

No.29, 3rd Floor, Jayalakshmi Estates, Haddows Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, IN, 600006

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.tvscredit.com
783/1000Fair

From the largest cities to the smallest villages, India is filled with ambition and enterprise. As Indians from all walks of life set out to write their growth story, our timely and affordable credit empowers them to bring their dreams alive. As part of the TVS Group,...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,593
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech

HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TVS Credit Services Ltd.

TVS Credit Services Ltd.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TVS Credit Services Ltd. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TVS Credit Services Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TVS Credit Services Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech

HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TVS Credit Services Ltd.

TVS Credit Services Ltd.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech company and TVS Credit Services Ltd. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech and TVS Credit Services Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech and TVS Credit Services Ltd., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech or TVS Credit Services Ltd. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech or TVS Credit Services Ltd. ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech and TVS Credit Services Ltd., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HKT Digital Ventures - Fintech and TVS Credit Services Ltd., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2