Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'
VS
Red BullRed Bull
Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'

Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'

Bronland 14, Wageningen, 6708, NL

Last Update: 23/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://hive.unilever.com/
766/1000Fair

Do you like to shake things up in the kitchen? How about the world? Welcome to Hive. Hive is Unilever’s global Foods Innovation Centre and we live at the Wageningen Campus in the Netherlands, the Silicon Valley of Food. At Foods, we bring the taste everyone loves, to br...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Red Bull

Red Bull

Am Brunnen 1, Fuschl, 5330, AT

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.redbull.com/jobs
820/1000Good

Red Bull Gives Wiiings to People and Ideas. This has driven us – and all we do – since 1987. Today, Red Bull operates in over 170 countries, selling more than 12 billion cans annually and growing! Above all, our people remain the essential ingredient in bringing the Red...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:29,022
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'

Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Red Bull

Red Bull

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Bull in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Red Bull (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Bull cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'

Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive'

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Red Bull

Red Bull

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' company and Red Bull company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' and Red Bull, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' and Red Bull, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' or Red Bull ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' or Red Bull ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' and Red Bull, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Unilever Foods Innovation Centre 'Hive' and Red Bull, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1