Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hitachi RailHitachi Rail
VS
TrenitaliaTrenitalia
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

60 Ludgate Hill, 7th Floor, One New Ludgate, London, England, GB, EC4M 7AW

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hitachirail.com
787/1000Fair

Hitachi Rail is committed to driving a sustainable mobility transition and helping every passenger, customer and community enjoy more connected, seamless and sustainable transport. Hitachi Rail is a trusted partner to operators around the world with expertise across eve...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:15,028
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

Piazza della Croce Rossa n. 1, ROMA, IT, 00161

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.trenitalia.com
732/1000Moderate

Trenitalia, the Ferrovie dello Stato Group's company for the transportation of passengers and the provision of logistics services for goods, is one of Europe’s largest rail operators. Trenitalia's mission is to provide services, in a domestic and European context, able...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:10,235
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hitachi Rail in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Trenitalia has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Hitachi Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hitachi Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Trenitalia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trenitalia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hitachi Rail

Hitachi Rail

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HIT811071525
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRE1782851855

FAQ

Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hitachi Rail company and Trenitalia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hitachi Rail and Trenitalia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hitachi Rail and Trenitalia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hitachi Rail or Trenitalia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hitachi Rail or Trenitalia ?
Between Hitachi Rail and Trenitalia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hitachi Rail and Trenitalia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA