Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Hitachi

Hitachi Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

hitachi.com

For over 100 years, Hitachi has been committed to developing innovations that improve lives. Today, this means creating superior technology and products that balance environment, well-being, and economic growth. We integrate IT, operational technology (OT), and products to transform critical infrastructure and industrial systems. Through Hitachi’s process for creating value from data, which we call Lumada, we combine rich industry insight and infrastructure expertise to create measurable, positive change. We operate across four global sectors – Digital Systems & Services, Energy, Mobility, and Connective Industries – plus a Strategic Social Innovation Business Unit developing next-generation solutions. With over 280,000 employees


Hitachi A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Hitachi
Company Information
Website:https://www.hitachi.com
Employees number:37,613
Number of followers:1,585,219
NAICS:5415
Industry Type:IT Services and IT Consulting
Homepage:hitachi.com
Hitachi Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 800 and 849
logo
HitachiIT Services and IT Consulting
Updated:
30/03/2026
827/1000
Good
A
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Hitachi Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
HitachiIT Services and IT Consulting
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Hitachi
HitachiGood
Current Score
827A (GOOD)
01000
1 incidents
0 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JUNE 2026
827Before Incident
MAY 2026
828Before Incident
APRIL 2026
827Before Incident
MARCH 2026
827Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
827Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
827Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
826Before Incident
Vulnerability
29 Dec 2025Hitachi
Moxa, Siemens, Hitachi Energy and Mitsubishi Electric: Team Cymru warns exposed ICS and OT devices targeted by nation-state actors raise industrial, critical infrastructure risks

Exposed ICS/OT Devices Under Nation-State Threat: Key Findings from Team Cymru’s Research

827After Incident
CRITICAL-1
SIEMOXMITHIT1774866497
Exposed ICS/OT Devices Under Nation-State Threat: Key Findings from Team Cymru’s Research Team Cymru’s latest research reveals alarming vulnerabilities in industrial control systems (ICS) and operational technology (OT) environments, highlighting how exposed devices remain prime targets for hostile nation-state actors. The report examines three case studies demonstrating the persistent risks to critical infrastructure, driven by poor security practices and active exploitation campaigns. ### Case Study 1: Destructive Attack on Polish Power Grid In December 2025, the Russian-linked Dragonfly group targeted Poland’s power grid by exploiting Hitachi RTU560 remote terminal units critical for electrical grid stability. Attackers leveraged default credentials on internet-exposed web interfaces, a common but preventable weakness. Once inside, they deployed a "hard brick" attack, uploading corrupted firmware that forced devices into an infinite reboot loop, rendering them inoperable. While the immediate impact was limited to communication disruptions, the attack demonstrated how basic access vectors could escalate into broader infrastructure degradation. ### Case Study 2: Moxa NPort Devices Compromised via Default Credentials The same Dragonfly campaign also targeted Moxa NPort devices, which bridge legacy serial equipment with modern IP networks. Despite supporting secure protocols like TLS and SSH, many devices remained vulnerable due to unrotated factory-default logins. Attackers gained administrative access, reset devices to factory settings, and reconfigured IP addresses to 127.0.0.1, effectively cutting them off from the network. Recovery required manual intervention, causing prolonged operational downtime. ### Case Study 3: Rockwell Automation Vulnerabilities Enable Remote Exploitation In July 2023, Rockwell Automation and CISA disclosed critical vulnerabilities (CVE-2023-3595, CVE-2023-3596) in Allen-Bradley ControlLogix communication modules. These flaws, attributed to a nation-state actor, allowed remote code execution via maliciously crafted Common Industrial Protocol (CIP) messages. Security firm Dragos compared the threat to TRISIS/TRITON-level attacks, noting that compromised modules could manipulate process data, maintain persistence, and evade detection potentially leading to catastrophic failures without operator awareness. ### Exposure Landscape: Key Statistics Team Cymru’s data reveals a troubling concentration of exposed devices: - Rockwell Automation dominates with 68.1% (6,653 unique IPs) of detected targets, reflecting its widespread use in North American and global industrial automation. - Moxa accounts for 15.7% (1,532 IPs), with attackers leveraging its networking equipment to pivot deeper into OT networks. - Other major vendors include Siemens (7.3%), Schneider Electric (4.5%), Hitachi Energy (4.2%), and Mitsubishi Electric (0.1%), all critical to European and Asian infrastructure. Geographically, the U.S. leads with 45.4% of exposed devices (1,269 IPs), a concern given Dragonfly and Volt Typhoon’s history of pre-positioning in critical sectors. Russia (4.3%), Ukraine (3.0%), and Taiwan (2.6%) also rank high, reflecting ongoing cyber warfare and geopolitical tensions. ### Broader Implications The research underscores a critical gap in ICS/OT security: thousands of devices remain internet-exposed despite best practices advising against direct public access. The persistence of default credentials, unpatched vulnerabilities, and nation-state reconnaissance efforts signals an urgent need for improved IT/OT convergence and proactive threat mitigation. Without intervention, these exposures risk enabling disruptive or destructive attacks on essential services.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber EspionageSabotageRemote Code Execution
MOTIVATION
Disruption of Critical InfrastructureCyber WarfareGeopolitical Tensions
IMPACT
Hitachi RTU560Moxa NPortAllen-Bradley ControlLogixDowntime: Prolonged operational downtime due to manual recoveryCommunication disruptionsInfinite reboot loopsNetwork isolationProcess data manipulation
NOVEMBER 2025
827Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
827Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
827Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
827Before Incident
JULY 2025
827Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Hitachi ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What was Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Hitachi's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Hitachi ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Hitachi's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?