Comparison Overview

History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)

VS

Royal Armouries Museum

History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)

159 Brattle St., Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, 02138
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Here in Cambridge, we don’t do history for history’s sake. It isn’t enough to present history as events that happened. We need to dig deeper, and answer “so what?” and “who cares?” Our humanities-focused approach to tackling contemporary issues through conversation and perspective-taking is one we’re proud of. History Cambridge was originally founded as Cambridge Historical Society in 1905. In 2021 we took a new direction and reinvented ourselves with a new name and a new mission: We engage with our city to explore how the past influences the present in order to shape a better future. Make history with us.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Royal Armouries Museum

Armouries Drive, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS10 1LT, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

The Royal Armouries is the United Kingdom’s national museum of arms and armour, and one of the most important museums of its type in the world. We have a long history, dating back to the Middle Ages. Our celebrated core collection originated in the nation’s working arsenal, which was assembled over many centuries at the Tower of London. The Royal Armouries are heir to one of the oldest deliberately created visitor attractions in the country. Objects were being arranged for display to visitors as early as Queen Elizabeth’s reign in the 16th century. Our collection of about 75,000 items – excluding approximately 2,700 loans to other bodies – is now displayed and housed in our historical home at the White Tower in the Tower of London but also at our purpose-built museum in Leeds, and at Fort Nelson near Portsmouth.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 168
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/history-cambridge.jpeg
History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-armouries-museum.jpeg
Royal Armouries Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Armouries Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Armouries Museum in 2026.

Incident History — History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Armouries Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Armouries Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/history-cambridge.jpeg
History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-armouries-museum.jpeg
Royal Armouries Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Royal Armouries Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Armouries Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company.

In the current year, Royal Armouries Museum company and History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum company nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum company nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Armouries Museum company nor History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company nor Royal Armouries Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) nor Royal Armouries Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company nor Royal Armouries Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Armouries Museum company employs more people globally than History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) nor Royal Armouries Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) nor Royal Armouries Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) nor Royal Armouries Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) nor Royal Armouries Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) nor Royal Armouries Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither History Cambridge (formerly Cambridge Historical Society) nor Royal Armouries Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H