Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hinduja Group LimitedHinduja Group Limited
VS
Larsen & ToubroLarsen & Toubro
Hinduja Group Limited

Hinduja Group Limited

Plot C-21, G- Block, Bandra Kurla Complex, Bandra (East), Mumbai, 400 051, IN

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.hindujagroup.com/
741/1000Moderate

The Hinduja Group is one of India’s premier diversified and transnational conglomerates with a presence in over 100 countries. It employs more than 2,50,000 people. The Group has significant investments in automotive, lubricants and specialty chemicals, banking and fina...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:681
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

N.M.Marg, Ballard Estate, Mumbai, Maharashtra, IN, 400001

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
806/1000Good

Larsen & Toubro is an Indian multinational engaged in EPC Projects, Hi-Tech Manufacturing and Services. It operates in over 50 countries worldwide. A strong, customer-focused approach and the constant quest for top-class quality have enabled L&T to attain and sustain ...

NAICS:92111
NAICS Definition:Executive Offices
Employees:135,733
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hinduja Group Limited

Hinduja Group Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hinduja Group Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Executive Offices Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Larsen & Toubro in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hinduja Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hinduja Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Larsen & Toubro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Larsen & Toubro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hinduja Group Limited

Hinduja Group Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Larsen & Toubro

Larsen & Toubro

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited company and Larsen & Toubro company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited and Larsen & Toubro, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hinduja Group Limited or Larsen & Toubro ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hinduja Group Limited or Larsen & Toubro ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hinduja Group Limited and Larsen & Toubro, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8