Comparison Overview
hims & hers

hims & hers
San Francisco, US
Last Update: 26/08/2026
Hims & Hers Health, Inc. (better known as Hims & Hers) is a multi-specialty telehealth platform building a virtual front door to the healthcare system. We connect consumers to licensed healthcare professionals, enabling people to access high-quality medical care—from wh...

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd
GB
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Forever Living Products and its affiliates are the largest growers, manufacturer and distributors of Aloe Vera products. The key to Forever Living's success is commitment to quality and purity. In order to ensure the highest quality, Forever Living cultivates aloe vera ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

hims & hers







Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
hims & hers has 23.46% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd in 2026.
Incident History - hims & hers (X = Date, Y = Severity)
hims & hers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

hims & hers

Forever Living Products (UK) Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.