Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Highmark Inc., together with its Blue-branded affiliates, collectively comprise the fifth largest overall Blue Cross Blue Shield-affiliated organization in the country with approximately 7.1 million members in Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia and western and northeastern New York. The following entities, which serve the noted regions, are independent licensees of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association: Western and Northeastern PA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; CPA/SEPA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield; Delaware: Highmark BCBSD Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; West Virginia: Highmark West Virginia Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Western NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Northeastern NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield. All references to “Highmark” are to Highmark Inc. and/or to one or more of its affiliated Blue companies. We're proudly part of Highmark Health.

Highmark A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Highmark

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

highmark

Employees number:

7,568

Number of followers:

49,297

NAICS:

524

Industry Type:

Insurance

Homepage:

highmark.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

HIG_2607714

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreHighmark Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 700 and 749

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highmark.jpeg
Highmark Insurance
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreHighmark Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highmark.jpeg
Highmark Insurance
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

Highmark Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
1
Attack Types
1
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
HighmarkBreach85412/2022NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Highmark on February 3, 2023. The breach occurred between December 13, 2022, and December 15, 2022, due to an external hacking incident, potentially affecting 300,000 individuals, including 2,774 Maine residents. The compromised information included names and social security numbers.

Highmark
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 12/2022
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Highmark on February 3, 2023. The breach occurred between December 13, 2022, and December 15, 2022, due to an external hacking incident, potentially affecting 300,000 individuals, including 2,774 Maine residents. The compromised information included names and social security numbers.

Ailogo

Highmark Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for Highmark

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highmark in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highmark in 2026.

Incident Types Highmark vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highmark in 2026.

Incident History — Highmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Highmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Highmark Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Highmark Inc., together with its Blue-branded affiliates, collectively comprise the fifth largest overall Blue Cross Blue Shield-affiliated organization in the country with approximately 7.1 million members in Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia and western and northeastern New York. The following entities, which serve the noted regions, are independent licensees of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association: Western and Northeastern PA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; CPA/SEPA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield; Delaware: Highmark BCBSD Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; West Virginia: Highmark West Virginia Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Western NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Northeastern NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield. All references to “Highmark” are to Highmark Inc. and/or to one or more of its affiliated Blue companies. We're proudly part of Highmark Health.

Loading...
similarCompanies

Highmark Similar Companies

Aviva

💛 We're a leading Insurance, Wealth & Retirement business. 📣 Follow for #LifeAtAviva. Aviva is nothing without our people. Living up to our purpose to be with you today for a better tomorrow applies to those we work with just as much as it does to our customers. We want Aviva to be a pla

HDFC Life

HDFC Life, one of India’s leading private life insurance companies, offers a range of individual and group insurance solutions. It is a joint venture between Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC), India’s leading housing finance institution and abrdn plc, the leading provider of fin

Great Eastern

For 117 years, we have been helping customers across generations by protecting, preserving and growing what matters to them. As One Great Eastern Group today, we are enabling the goals of over 15.5 million customers by taking care of their needs across life, health, wealth and general insurance, con

SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

SBI Life Insurance (‘SBI Life’ / ‘The Company’), one of the most trusted life insurance companies in India, was incorporated in October 2000 and is registered with the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) in March 2001. Serving millions of families across India, SBI Li

China Life Insurance Co.Ltd

China Life Insurance (Group) Company, headquartered in Beijing, is a large state-owned financial and insurance company. Its predecessor,PICC was founded in 1949 and the PICC (Life) Co.,Ltd was set up in 1996 after its separation from the former PICC. In 1999, it was renamed China Life Insurance Comp

AIA Group Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively “AIA” or the “Group”) comprise the largest independent publicly listed pan-Asian life insurance group. It has a presence in 18 markets – wholly-owned branches and subsidiaries in Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR(1), Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Aus

State Farm

At State Farm®, our mission is to help people manage the risks of everyday life, recover from the unexpected, and realize their dreams. We are passionate and driven to create possibilities, and we’re serious about helping customers by providing solutions for all of life’s moments. Like a good neighb

中国人民保险 PICC

Founded in October 1949, The People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China is the first nation-wide insurance company in the People’s Republic of China and has developed into a leading large-scale integrated insurance financial group in the PRC, ranking 208th on the Global 500 (2014) published by the

Generali

Generali enables people to shape a safer and more sustainable future by caring for their lives and dreams. The Generali Group is one of the most significant players in the global insurance and financial products market. The Group is leader in Italy and Assicurazioni Generali, founded in 1831 in Tri

newsone

Highmark CyberSecurity News

December 17, 2025 08:00 AM
UnitedHealth, Elevance, Aetna tops in insurance market share: AMA

Centene and Highmark joined the top 10 while Humana and Blue Shield of California fell in the rankings.

December 15, 2025 08:00 AM
AI-powered coding, high utilization drag down Highmark earnings

Highmark Health reported a net loss of $69 million in the first three quarters.

October 21, 2025 07:00 AM
Young Alumni Award Recipients

The Young Alumni Award recognizes alumni who have graduated from Geneva within the past 10 years and demonstrate outstanding service and...

August 26, 2025 07:00 AM
Buffalo Bills and Cisco Embark on Multi-Year Partnership at Start of 2025-2026 Season

Cisco to Deliver Critical Infrastructure and Deploy Industry-Leading Solutions Across Networking, Wireless and IPTV to Power the Team in the...

August 11, 2025 07:00 AM
48 CIOs On the Move

This month, we're highlighting 48 CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs taking on leadership roles in industries from healthcare to finance to technology.

July 14, 2025 10:04 PM
Meet the Commissioner | Insurance Department

Michael Humphreys was named Insurance Commissioner on February 28, 2022, and confirmed unanimously on June 27, 2023. As commissioner, Humphreys is charged...

June 23, 2025 07:00 AM
AHIP 2025: Executive insights from Aetna, Anterior, Ascendiun and more

Here are the five key takeaways from last week's AHIP conference, including a push to reform prior authorization.

May 28, 2025 07:00 AM
Blue Cross Blue Shield plans reverse course on GLP-1 coverage

Blue Cross plans are retreating from GLP-1 weight-loss drug coverage after spending hundreds of millions of dollars on the highly popular...

April 29, 2025 07:00 AM
Highmark Must Face Bulk Of Data Breach Lawsuit

A group of individuals who said their personal information was compromised in a phishing attack against health insurer Highmark can largely...

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

Highmark CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Highmark

The official website of Highmark is http://www.highmark.com.

Highmark’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Highmark’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 728, reflecting their Moderate security posture.

How many security badges does Highmark’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Highmark currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Highmark been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Highmark has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Highmark have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Highmark is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Highmark have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Highmark does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Highmark comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Highmark is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Highmark have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Highmark does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Highmark comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Highmark is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Highmark have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Highmark is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Highmark

Highmark operates primarily in the Insurance industry.

Number of Employees at Highmark

Highmark employs approximately 7,568 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Highmark

Highmark presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Highmark’s LinkedIn Followers

Highmark’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 49,297 followers.

NAICS Classification of Highmark

Highmark is classified under the NAICS code 524, which corresponds to Insurance Carriers and Related Activities.

Highmark’s Presence on Crunchbase

Yes, Highmark has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/highmark.

Highmark’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Highmark maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/highmark.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Highmark

As of January 22, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Highmark has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Highmark has an estimated 15,156 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Highmark ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Highmark Data Breach

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Highmark on February 3, 2023. The breach occurred between December 13, 2022, and December 15, 2022, due to an external hacking incident, potentially affecting 300,000 individuals, including 2,774 Maine residents. The compromised information included names and social security numbers.

Date Detected: 2023-02-03

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-02-03

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: External Hacking

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIG753080425

Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Names, Social Security Numbers and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIG753080425

Entity Name: Highmark

Entity Type: Health Insurance Company

Industry: Healthcare

Customers Affected: 300000

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach HIG753080425

Type of Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers

Number of Records Exposed: 300000

Sensitivity of Data: High

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach HIG753080425

Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General

Date Accessed: 2023-02-03

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2023-02-03.

Additional Questions

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2023-02-03.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-02-03.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Names, Social Security Numbers and .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Names and Social Security Numbers.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 300.0.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Maine Office of the Attorney General.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=highmark' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge