Company Details
highmark
7,568
49,297
524
highmark.com
0
HIG_2607714
In-progress


Highmark Company CyberSecurity Posture
highmark.comAn independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Highmark Inc., together with its Blue-branded affiliates, collectively comprise the fifth largest overall Blue Cross Blue Shield-affiliated organization in the country with approximately 7.1 million members in Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia and western and northeastern New York. The following entities, which serve the noted regions, are independent licensees of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association: Western and Northeastern PA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; CPA/SEPA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield; Delaware: Highmark BCBSD Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; West Virginia: Highmark West Virginia Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Western NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Northeastern NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield. All references to “Highmark” are to Highmark Inc. and/or to one or more of its affiliated Blue companies. We're proudly part of Highmark Health.
Company Details
highmark
7,568
49,297
524
highmark.com
0
HIG_2607714
In-progress
Between 700 and 749

Highmark Global Score (TPRM)XXXX

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Highmark on February 3, 2023. The breach occurred between December 13, 2022, and December 15, 2022, due to an external hacking incident, potentially affecting 300,000 individuals, including 2,774 Maine residents. The compromised information included names and social security numbers.


No incidents recorded for Highmark in 2026.
No incidents recorded for Highmark in 2026.
No incidents recorded for Highmark in 2026.
Highmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

An independent licensee of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, Highmark Inc., together with its Blue-branded affiliates, collectively comprise the fifth largest overall Blue Cross Blue Shield-affiliated organization in the country with approximately 7.1 million members in Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia and western and northeastern New York. The following entities, which serve the noted regions, are independent licensees of the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association: Western and Northeastern PA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; CPA/SEPA: Highmark Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield; Delaware: Highmark BCBSD Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; West Virginia: Highmark West Virginia Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Western NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Cross Blue Shield; Northeastern NY: Highmark Western and Northeastern New York Inc. d/b/a Highmark Blue Shield. All references to “Highmark” are to Highmark Inc. and/or to one or more of its affiliated Blue companies. We're proudly part of Highmark Health.

💛 We're a leading Insurance, Wealth & Retirement business. 📣 Follow for #LifeAtAviva. Aviva is nothing without our people. Living up to our purpose to be with you today for a better tomorrow applies to those we work with just as much as it does to our customers. We want Aviva to be a pla
HDFC Life, one of India’s leading private life insurance companies, offers a range of individual and group insurance solutions. It is a joint venture between Housing Development Finance Corporation Limited (HDFC), India’s leading housing finance institution and abrdn plc, the leading provider of fin
For 117 years, we have been helping customers across generations by protecting, preserving and growing what matters to them. As One Great Eastern Group today, we are enabling the goals of over 15.5 million customers by taking care of their needs across life, health, wealth and general insurance, con
SBI Life Insurance (‘SBI Life’ / ‘The Company’), one of the most trusted life insurance companies in India, was incorporated in October 2000 and is registered with the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) in March 2001. Serving millions of families across India, SBI Li

China Life Insurance (Group) Company, headquartered in Beijing, is a large state-owned financial and insurance company. Its predecessor,PICC was founded in 1949 and the PICC (Life) Co.,Ltd was set up in 1996 after its separation from the former PICC. In 1999, it was renamed China Life Insurance Comp
AIA Group Limited and its subsidiaries (collectively “AIA” or the “Group”) comprise the largest independent publicly listed pan-Asian life insurance group. It has a presence in 18 markets – wholly-owned branches and subsidiaries in Mainland China, Hong Kong SAR(1), Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Aus

At State Farm®, our mission is to help people manage the risks of everyday life, recover from the unexpected, and realize their dreams. We are passionate and driven to create possibilities, and we’re serious about helping customers by providing solutions for all of life’s moments. Like a good neighb

Founded in October 1949, The People’s Insurance Company (Group) of China is the first nation-wide insurance company in the People’s Republic of China and has developed into a leading large-scale integrated insurance financial group in the PRC, ranking 208th on the Global 500 (2014) published by the

Generali enables people to shape a safer and more sustainable future by caring for their lives and dreams. The Generali Group is one of the most significant players in the global insurance and financial products market. The Group is leader in Italy and Assicurazioni Generali, founded in 1831 in Tri
.png)
Centene and Highmark joined the top 10 while Humana and Blue Shield of California fell in the rankings.
Highmark Health reported a net loss of $69 million in the first three quarters.
The Young Alumni Award recognizes alumni who have graduated from Geneva within the past 10 years and demonstrate outstanding service and...
Cisco to Deliver Critical Infrastructure and Deploy Industry-Leading Solutions Across Networking, Wireless and IPTV to Power the Team in the...
This month, we're highlighting 48 CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs taking on leadership roles in industries from healthcare to finance to technology.
Michael Humphreys was named Insurance Commissioner on February 28, 2022, and confirmed unanimously on June 27, 2023. As commissioner, Humphreys is charged...
Here are the five key takeaways from last week's AHIP conference, including a push to reform prior authorization.
Blue Cross plans are retreating from GLP-1 weight-loss drug coverage after spending hundreds of millions of dollars on the highly popular...
A group of individuals who said their personal information was compromised in a phishing attack against health insurer Highmark can largely...

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
The official website of Highmark is http://www.highmark.com.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 728, reflecting their Moderate security posture.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark is not listed as GDPR compliant.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
According to Rankiteo, Highmark is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
According to Rankiteo,Highmark is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Highmark operates primarily in the Insurance industry.
Highmark employs approximately 7,568 people worldwide.
Highmark presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Highmark’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 49,297 followers.
Highmark is classified under the NAICS code 524, which corresponds to Insurance Carriers and Related Activities.
Yes, Highmark has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/highmark.
Yes, Highmark maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/highmark.
As of January 22, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Highmark has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.
Highmark has an estimated 15,156 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
Title: Highmark Data Breach
Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Highmark on February 3, 2023. The breach occurred between December 13, 2022, and December 15, 2022, due to an external hacking incident, potentially affecting 300,000 individuals, including 2,774 Maine residents. The compromised information included names and social security numbers.
Date Detected: 2023-02-03
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2023-02-03
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Names, Social Security Numbers and .

Entity Name: Highmark
Entity Type: Health Insurance Company
Industry: Healthcare
Customers Affected: 300000

Type of Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 300000
Sensitivity of Data: High

Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General
Date Accessed: 2023-02-03
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2023-02-03.
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2023-02-03.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2023-02-03.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Names, Social Security Numbers and .
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Names and Social Security Numbers.
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 300.0.
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is Maine Office of the Attorney General.
.png)
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.
Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.
FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.
The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Get company history
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.