Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HI-LINEHI-LINE
VS
VeoliaVeolia
HI-LINE

HI-LINE

Brookfield Yard, Exeter, Devon, EX4 2HF, GB

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.hi-line.co.uk
753/1000Fair

Tree services including lifting/reduction/thinning, felling and stump grinding, hedge maintenance, tree planting and aftercare. Consultancy service. 03334 4567886

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:158
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Veolia

Veolia

30, Rue Madeleine Vionnet, Aubervilliers, Île-de-France, FR, 93300

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.veolia.com/en/
799/1000Fair

Veolia group aims to be the benchmark company for ecological transformation. With nearly 220,000 employees worldwide, the Group designs and provides game-changing solutions that are both useful and practical for water, waste and energy management. Through its three comp...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:47,800
Subsidiaries:72
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HI-LINE

HI-LINE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Veolia

Veolia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HI-LINE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Veolia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - HI-LINE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HI-LINE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Veolia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Veolia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HI-LINE

HI-LINE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Veolia

Veolia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HI-LINE company and Veolia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HI-LINE and Veolia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HI-LINE and Veolia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HI-LINE or Veolia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HI-LINE or Veolia ?
Between HI-LINE and Veolia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HI-LINE and Veolia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1