Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

HEXPOL CompoundingHEXPOL Compounding
VS
BASFBASF
HEXPOL Compounding

HEXPOL Compounding

Skeppsbron 3, Malmö, 211 20, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://www.hexpol.com/
689/1000Weak

HEXPOL Compounding is a leading global developer and manufacturer of quality polymer compounds. Our rich heritage embraces customer collaboration by sharing innovation and market knowledge to match the right compound with the application. We provide proprietary compound...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:927
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
BASF

BASF

Carl-Bosch-Str. 38, Ludwigshafen, DE, 67056

Last Update: 07/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.basf.com
743/1000Moderate

At BASF, we create chemistry for a sustainable future. Our ambition: We want to be the preferred chemical company to enable our customers’ green transformation. We combine economic success with environmental protection and social responsibility. Around 112,000 employees...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:68,316
Subsidiaries:43
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
HEXPOL Compounding

HEXPOL Compounding

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BASF

BASF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

HEXPOL Compounding has 60.78% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

BASF has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - HEXPOL Compounding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HEXPOL Compounding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BASF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BASF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
HEXPOL Compounding

HEXPOL Compounding

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HEX1775148772
BASF

BASF

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAYSOLHONBAS1770310511

FAQ

Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding company and BASF company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding and BASF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding and BASF, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - HEXPOL Compounding or BASF ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - HEXPOL Compounding or BASF ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding and BASF, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between HEXPOL Compounding and BASF, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8